Sold: New$ Drp LN 135 f/2
/forum/topic/789252/0

1
2 end

tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

HAVE WORKED OUT A TRADE WITH mjo421


I recently picked this lens up from a friend here but things have change. I have found a good deal on another lens that I need more than a prime and need money to swing this. This lens is perfect in every way and as all 135 it does a very good job even the hood is mark free. It's in like new condition and comes with everything as new including an invoice dated feb 23rd 2009 and a date code UW Here are some sample shots and for my ability these are good and in the right hands think what can be done with this lens LOl

http://tanglefoot47.smugmug.com/gallery/8781944_ss56b/#581328420_k2CXT

The last 5 shots I just took and shot at f/2 straight from the camera. The flower shots are also at f/2 along with I think most of them.

My price shipped to your door is $930 NOW $900 shipped




thank you
Mike



belldandy13
Registered: Feb 05, 2009
Total Posts: 166
Country: Canada

PM'd



Brad Barr
Registered: Feb 13, 2007
Total Posts: 688
Country: United States

Canon or NIkon?? Sounds like Canon from the date code....



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

NIKON MAKES A !#%? how about that yes it's a Canon



Stanicmi
Registered: Feb 01, 2009
Total Posts: 77
Country: United States

tanglefoot47 wrote:
NIKON MAKES A !#%? how about that yes it's a Canon

Nikon 135mm f/2D AF-DC Nikkor

http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=77



mjo421
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Total Posts: 546
Country: United States

HAHAHAHAHA



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

Stanicmi wrote:
tanglefoot47 wrote:
NIKON MAKES A !#%? how about that yes it's a Canon

Nikon 135mm f/2D AF-DC Nikkor

http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=77


Yes I know I have a poor sense of humor Wow and it's get a 9.9 ranking must be a good one



Greg Feldman
Registered: Mar 14, 2005
Total Posts: 5423
Country: United States

The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

Greg Feldman wrote:
The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.




Yes sir



Taylor Barrett
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Total Posts: 1733
Country: United States

Greg Feldman wrote:
The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.



As a Canon and Nikon shooter both are great lenses but you should try the Nikon. Gimmicks aside its a legendary piece of glass.



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

Taylor Barrett wrote:
Greg Feldman wrote:
The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.



As a Canon and Nikon shooter both are great lenses but you should try the Nikon. Gimmicks aside its a legendary piece of glass.


Kind of thought the Canon 135 f/2 was also legendary piece of glass. It's a great lens but at the moment I am not jumping the Canon ship. But back in my Nikon days that is the lens I wanted most just never got one



treebeard
Registered: Sep 21, 2006
Total Posts: 3191
Country: United States

tanglefoot47 wrote:
Taylor Barrett wrote:
Greg Feldman wrote:
The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.



As a Canon and Nikon shooter both are great lenses but you should try the Nikon. Gimmicks aside its a legendary piece of glass.


Kind of thought the Canon 135 f/2 was also legendary piece of glass. It's a great lens but at the moment I am not jumping the Canon ship. But back in my Nikon days that is the lens I wanted most just never got one


The 135 f/2 was probably my favorite lens when I was shooting Canon. I would give you a bump but I don't think you really need one based upon your feedback!



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

treebeard wrote:
tanglefoot47 wrote:
Taylor Barrett wrote:
Greg Feldman wrote:
The Canon 135 makes world-class photos without any silly gimmicks, though.



As a Canon and Nikon shooter both are great lenses but you should try the Nikon. Gimmicks aside its a legendary piece of glass.


Kind of thought the Canon 135 f/2 was also legendary piece of glass. It's a great lens but at the moment I am not jumping the Canon ship. But back in my Nikon days that is the lens I wanted most just never got one


The 135 f/2 was probably my favorite lens when I was shooting Canon. I would give you a bump but I don't think you really need one based upon your feedback!


Well I don't know about the feedback thing seems some have doubts about it



beepclick
Registered: Apr 01, 2008
Total Posts: 162
Country: United States

Yuri Arcurssays the Canon 135 f/2 is sharp.

If Yuri says it's sharp, it's sharp.

Free bump.



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

Well I have to agree with Yuri it's a great lens and I must be nuts for trying to sell it Thanks for the bump



treaks
Registered: Feb 23, 2005
Total Posts: 338
Country: United States

Mike, if your average sale or purchase is $300 @ 339 transactions that puts you over $100,000 in dollars changing hands. President Obama should put you in charge of stimulating the economy.

Treaks



mjo421
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Total Posts: 546
Country: United States

Yeah, but Mike loses money on every transaction he makes. Ask him. Not to worry, he makes it up on volume, right Mike?



jwerling1
Registered: Jan 18, 2005
Total Posts: 564
Country: United States

Mr. Obama's economic plan won't return as much on the dollar as Mike's does, eventhough they both lose money!



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

jwerling1 wrote:
Mr. Obama's economic plan won't return as much on the dollar as Mike's does, eventhough they both lose money!


But I have much more fun and people don't hate me and I am not losing as much as OB is for us



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

I believe all the flower shots are at f/2 and the last 5 shots I just took at f/2 straight out of the camera



Jonathan
Registered: Oct 01, 2003
Total Posts: 2121
Country: United States

I can't believe this is still here...I'd rather buy from Mike than B&H, and not just because his prices are better



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

Home from work bump



princeeric2
Registered: Oct 02, 2007
Total Posts: 324
Country: United States

Jonathan wrote:
I can't believe this is still here...I'd rather buy from Mike than B&H, and not just because his prices are better


I was going to say this, but someone had said it already.
Well, bump for one of the best seller on FM. Goodluck Mike!



tanglefoot47
Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Total Posts: 8732
Country: United States

New price drop darn it's a tough market



OutsideShooter
Registered: May 31, 2006
Total Posts: 1739
Country: United States

Hey Mike how about I send you a photo I took last week at Latourell Falls, and you send me your lens? We'll call it an even trade. See how easy markets can be when you're flexible...

Here you go: http://www.imagekind.com/GalleryProfile.aspx?gid=aabe80fb-8e21-440a-8648-b1b6bd28c16b



1
2 end