Sold: Canon 24-70mm L
/forum/topic/789000/0

1
2 end

kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Brand new UX06 bought this new several days ago. $1100 (echeck + USPS Priority Mail shipping included) FIRM. PM me if you are interested. Canon USA warranty for the next 11 and 1/2 months.

Low ball offers will be ignored as always

Shots from RAW to DPP:

24mm@f/2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


70mm@f/2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner





Mendal
Registered: Apr 02, 2009
Total Posts: 35
Country: United States

He shot these wide open at f 2.8. I would say its pretty sharp just noisy. Could have used a lower ISO. This is an awesome lens for walk around. If you consider the shot at 24mm looks to be shot in a hallway with no lighting I think it came out pretty good. Kewlcanon you might want to consider stepping outside and and shooting something else at 24mm to show this lens gets pretty wide.



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Thanks Mendal, you are correct, very bad lighting...this is on XTi ISO 1600 so it's noisy .

Mendal wrote:
He shot these wide open at f 2.8. I would say its pretty sharp just noisy. Could have used a lower ISO. This is an awesome lens for walk around. If you consider the shot at 24mm looks to be shot in a hallway with no lighting I think it came out pretty good. Kewlcanon you might want to consider stepping outside and and shooting something else at 24mm to show this lens gets pretty wide.



alpha_1976
Registered: Mar 01, 2007
Total Posts: 572
Country: United States

Doesn't look like soft to me!


krustooo wrote:
soft copy eh?



flyover
Registered: Jun 09, 2009
Total Posts: 232
Country: United States

you'd better take some samples hots at a lower ISO.. XTi is bad on high ISO.



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Hgh fives!

alpha_1976 wrote:
Doesn't look like soft to me!


krustooo wrote:
soft copy eh?




kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

I know...I've just repackaged the lens though

flyover wrote:
you'd better take some samples hots at a lower ISO.. XTi is bad on high ISO.



Samuel Gao
Registered: Nov 09, 2008
Total Posts: 173
Country: United States

looks soft to me too.... but bump for a good, but heavy lens



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

If it looks soft to you then send it to Canon that's the advantage of buying lens with warranty!.

Samuel Gao wrote:
looks soft to me too.... but bump for a good, but heavy lens



rextilleon
Registered: Jun 22, 2003
Total Posts: 767
Country: N/A

Yeah, I would unpack it and take some more shots---The idea is to sell the lens and you would probably have a better shot if you did it again.



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

The more I shoot with it the more I like it. colors are beautiful..I might keep it

This image is copyrighted by the owner


rextilleon wrote:
Yeah, I would unpack it and take some more shots---The idea is to sell the lens and you would probably have a better shot if you did it again.



Mendal
Registered: Apr 02, 2009
Total Posts: 35
Country: United States

I love my 24-70. What KC did you buy every lens in the canon inventory just to try them out? I see you have a 24-105 out there and I was very tempted by your 10-22 a couple weeks ago!



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Yeah colors are vivid . It's kinda heavy but I think I can get used to it. 10-22mm is another awesome lens, I miss it . I'm trying to get 50L now hehehehe.

Mendal wrote:
I love my 24-70. What KC did you buy every lens in the canon inventory just to try them out? I see you have a 24-105 out there and I was very tempted by your 10-22 a couple weeks ago!



DorkieDooDe
Registered: Mar 12, 2009
Total Posts: 35
Country: United States

i think there's a dust on your sensor.



lpazxxsh
Registered: Jun 01, 2005
Total Posts: 1146
Country: United States

looks soft to me... should shoot one at f/4 just for comparison. BTW canon warranty is not tranferable. Just checked last week.



telluridestock
Registered: Dec 20, 2008
Total Posts: 461
Country: United States

PMED



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Hahahah you probably new with Canon..I've sent tons of used lenses under warranty.

lpazxxsh wrote:
looks soft to me... should shoot one at f/4 just for comparison. BTW canon warranty is not tranferable. Just checked last week.



ryanvo
Registered: Mar 19, 2008
Total Posts: 13
Country: United States

When I asked them about it, they said the warranty does not transfer. But when it comes to it, the will repair the lens as long as it's under the warranty period.



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Yep....Heil Canon!.

ryanvo wrote:
When I asked them about it, they said the warranty does not transfer. But when it comes to it, the will repair the lens as long as it's under the warranty period.



lpazxxsh
Registered: Jun 01, 2005
Total Posts: 1146
Country: United States

kewlcanon wrote:
Hahahah you probably new with Canon..I've sent tons of used lenses under warranty.

lpazxxsh wrote:
looks soft to me... should shoot one at f/4 just for comparison. BTW canon warranty is not tranferable. Just checked last week.



Nope...not new. Been turned down a few times because the receipt is under some elses name. For a $90 more than your selling it for you can just buy a new one from b&h (Free Shipping and regular credit card) and save you the trouble of having to prove your the original purchaser. Plus you can return it to B&H if you dont get a sharp copy. I'll tell you what you can do is offer to help with the warranty if you have trouble with any claims with canon within 12 months.



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Well too bad you're just not lucky..maybe you've pissed Canon before ?

lpazxxsh wrote:
kewlcanon wrote:
Hahahah you probably new with Canon..I've sent tons of used lenses under warranty.

lpazxxsh wrote:
looks soft to me... should shoot one at f/4 just for comparison. BTW canon warranty is not tranferable. Just checked last week.



Nope...not new. Been turned down a few times because the receipt is under some elses name. For a few dollars more than your selling it for you can just buy a new one from b&h and save you the trouble of having to prove your the original purchaser. Plus you can return it to B&H if you dont get a sharp copy. What you can do is offer to help with the warranty if you have trouble with any claims.



Tom Abbott
Registered: Jul 01, 2007
Total Posts: 1012
Country: United States

kewlcanon wrote:
Brand new UX06 bought this new several days ago.


Why not just return it and get the refund??



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

10% restocking fee ..won't matter I can keep it too.

Tom Abbott wrote:
kewlcanon wrote:
Brand new UX06 bought this new several days ago.


Why not just return it and get the refund??



lpazxxsh
Registered: Jun 01, 2005
Total Posts: 1146
Country: United States

kewlcanon wrote:
Well too bad you're just not lucky..maybe you've pissed Canon before ?



So thats what it takes to get warranty work done from Canon is be "LUCKY"? Hummm. I think i'll just buy a NEW one for $1190 at B&H with my credit card.

Good luck with your sale



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 2657
Country: United States

Well everybody is LUCKY except .... ...

lpazxxsh wrote:
kewlcanon wrote:
Well too bad you're just not lucky..maybe you've pissed Canon before ?



So thats what it takes to get warranty work done from Canon is be "LUCKY"? Hummm. I think i'll just buy a NEW one for $1190 at B&H with my credit card.

Good luck with your sale



1
2 end