|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
Hey All, |
|
pixelpix Registered: Jul 19, 2002 Total Posts: 281 Country: Australia |
I am sure that you will get more samples, but to get the ball rolling I will offer all that I have. ![]() 100% Crops ![]() These were accidently shot at 1600iso so they could be cleaner. I no longer have this lens, as I just didn't use it..... but it was very sharp from corner to corner @f8. (Sorry no wide open samples) |
|
Ed Sawyer Registered: May 08, 2007 Total Posts: 1974 Country: United States |
sounds like you should try a different 35/2 first, they should be reasonably sharp @ f2. that said, the 35/2 should be better than the 35/2.8 in general. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
Thanks. Yeah I know I should look into another 35/2 but all the ones I can find (like on KEH) are more than I want to pay right now. That's why I was going to use the 35/2.8 as a fairly short term solution. |
|
alexandre Registered: Jun 30, 2005 Total Posts: 2542 Country: Brazil |
there's one @ bh |
|
IDURITA Registered: Jan 13, 2005 Total Posts: 566 Country: Germany |
Hi, |
|
pdmphoto Registered: Jan 02, 2005 Total Posts: 3079 Country: United States |
I had a few Zuiko 35/2's and wasn't happy with the FF performance of any one sample. The biggest problem seemed to be a very curved focus plane. I also had a few copies of the Zuiko 35/2.8 and was very happy with it's full frame performance. It capable of better center and edge sharpness when stopped down a little. I still own my best copy even though I don't use it much. It's my goto lens when I want to travel small and light with a 35mm focal length: ![]() |
|
Ronan O Keeffe Registered: Sep 15, 2006 Total Posts: 730 Country: Ireland |
I hear the Minolta 1.8 calling |
|
rsrsrs Registered: May 14, 2008 Total Posts: 542 Country: Germany |
i do have the minolta 35mm 1,8 @ my 5D. |
|
JimBuchanan Registered: Jan 11, 2006 Total Posts: 1113 Country: United States |
Sorry for not commenting on these 2 lenses specifically, but I have faced this slower/faster lens conundrum, too. |
|
rsrsrs Registered: May 14, 2008 Total Posts: 542 Country: Germany |
![]() regards reinhard |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
Thanks for the responses guys! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() After seeing more sample shots, I'm heavily considering the Voigtlander 40mm f/2. What a beauty, but more than I want to spend... |
|
Ronan O Keeffe Registered: Sep 15, 2006 Total Posts: 730 Country: Ireland |
The Minolta I have is very small, the HH version is large alright though. This is the one I have. |
|
Ed Sawyer Registered: May 08, 2007 Total Posts: 1974 Country: United States |
The minolta 35/1.8 is quite a nice lens. I have a spare unconverted one of those if anyone is looking for one. It's the (better) earlier Rokkor-HH version, metal focus grip. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
Thanks. If I were to spend the money on the Minolta, I'd probably opt to get the MD version due to its size and weight. |
|
Ed Sawyer Registered: May 08, 2007 Total Posts: 1974 Country: United States |
The MC version is the one to have - sharper and a lot less vignetting (the MD has a 49mm filter mount which tends to vignette a fair bit). Conversion is easier on the MC also. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
Thanks Ed. It's my battle between small and lightweight and speed. The size is really important to me (otherwise I won't take my camera anywhere...thus making the lens useless) so I'd rather give up a little sharpness (vignetting doesn't bother me...I add it in post oftentimes anyway!) and have the lens smaller. |
|
rsrsrs Registered: May 14, 2008 Total Posts: 542 Country: Germany |
hi Ed, |
|
Ed Sawyer Registered: May 08, 2007 Total Posts: 1974 Country: United States |
The zuikos in general are superb. It's hard to not get addicted to them. ;-) |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2008 Country: United States |
It's true! We'll see when I get it in the mail |
|
dfresh Registered: Feb 13, 2005 Total Posts: 2508 Country: United States |
Patrick, how did your new 35/2 compare? I got one recently and after a brief outing with it (my first MF lens), I would say its reasonably sharp wide open at f2. Its too early to tell but it almost looked like one stop down at f2.8 was as sharp as f8 or f11. I'm really loving the contrast and colors of this lens, I feel a Zuiko addiction commencing... |
|
cavewalker Registered: Dec 27, 2008 Total Posts: 290 Country: Germany |
I have also a Zuiko 35/2 and it's a bit soft and have low contrast wide open. If you want a sharp lens wide open go for the Zeiss Flektogon 35/2.4 |