During what time periods was this lens sold by Nikon, and was it the predecessor to the current generation 300 f2.8 VR lens?

Is a lens hood a (a $300 item) a recommended/useful accessory? (I personally don't shoot without a hood, but at this price, I might reconsider)

What would be a good price for a good to excellent condition copy?

Just follow this link.

http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html

Thanks for the link. It looks as though any version would be out of warranty. Does anyone have any first hand experience with this version?

Greetings,

I have this version, which I absolutely love - incredibly fast. What information do you require?

Cheers,
Scott

Scott, Thanks for replying. How does it compare vs. the current VR version? I've pulled up some old discussions of this lens, and am pouring through them. I'm considering purchasing the AF-S II version, but would like to have a better understanding of it.

So far, I see that it lacks the latest nano coatings, and some have said that it's bokeh is not as pleasant as the current VR version (which sets a VERY high standard). Is ~$2800 a good price?

Considering I already own the AF-S 300 mm f4, I'm not sure whether this lens will be the right upgrade. I presently shoot Middle School sports (for fun, not selling . . . yet) and would use it for wildlife/birds. I already have the 1.4 & 1.7 teleconverters, so I'm set there. I just don't know if I should go for the AF-S II or hold out for the newer and improved VR version.

As to a hood, don't leave home without it. They are stupidly expensive but necessary. There are a couple of ways to make your own (cheesey, but cheap). Check the search engines and I'm sure you'll come up with a how-to.

Chris,

The copy that I possess, along with others that I have seen, is fantastic. Could there be a difference with the newest VR version, yes - but I do not feel that you would actually see any potential difference in any real world application. (I cannot)

As far as price - very good. I spent over $2600 on mine, but it came from a wealthy friend. I have seen them for sale in the $2700 to $3400 range. If the lens is in excellent condition (mine was essentially new), jump on it - you will love the 2.8, along with the focus speed. Mine is utilized exclusively on my D700.

Cheers,
Scott

Here is a brief comparison as such between all Nikon 300 lenses. I just picked this up and one shooting shows it is very good; likely not as sharp as my 200 VR. I also don't think it will be as good with converters as is the 200 VR. Send me your email if you want to see some images.

http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html

I think the one you are talking about is priced very attractively but I would get the hood. It will make a difference in shooting results and you need something to protect the glass.

Randy

Thanks for the help everyone. I just bought one of these lenses off the FM Buy & Sell forum. Now comes the tough part . . . waiting for it to arrive!

NAS strikes again!