I didn't want to comment in the actual critique thread, but would it be possible for "doubleblind" to re-host the pics on flickr or somewhere and also strip the exif?

Otherwise it's kinda easy to figure out who was behind the camera.

^

Changed OP to reflect.

It's a great idea that makes sense.

This begs the real big question who is doubleblind really!?

ContagiousIdea wrote:
This begs the real big question who is doubleblind really!?


agreed. this is almost more interesting than seeing the photos...! I'm already trying to guess.

... I still don't understand. I feel like a chozo; how does this work?

i really like this idea!

In addition to posting anonymously, how about giving feedback anonymously? That way we can be (brutally) honest about it, and can really be "double blind". I don't have wedding photos, can we have something like this in the People Forum? Thanks.

If you want to reply anonymously - I can do that. Real critiques though, no one liners. PM and be sure to include the thread title.

I can't use PM right now - can I email?

DB wrote:
I can't use PM right now - can I email?

Sorry, no. PM only.

asking if you can remove "jesus" out of the subject. too many things is involved when using jesus.

Whats wrong with jesus? Maybe doubleblind is referring to that amazing bowler on 'The Big Lebowski'.

nothing wrong with jesus. good either way - if you are in either club you can enjoy it.

elader wrote:
not double-blinded, only single blinded - double would mean that the photographer didnt know which were his pics.

I believe double blind would be if the user "Double Blind" (poster of the thread) didn't know the origin of the photographs, since he is the administrator. That way he can't bias the results.

Ok, since I can't PM, can I trust someone on FM to pm for me? LIke I could email you the post, you could PM it to doubleblind? Anyone? Anyone?

Ummm, I have no clue what is being talked about, is this for some internal competition or something?


Niel
hangar-77.com

DB.. send it to me, I'll PM it to doubleblind.

jprezant wrote:
elader wrote:
not double-blinded, only single blinded - double would mean that the photographer didnt know which were his pics.

I believe double blind would be if the user "Double Blind" (poster of the thread) didn't know the origin of the photographs, since he is the administrator. That way he can't bias the results.




Seems to me "double blind" should refer to (1) the source of the photos and (2) the source of the C&C. If both of those parties are anonymous, the transaction is double blind.

CarminaF wrote:

Whats wrong with jesus? Maybe doubleblind is referring to that amazing bowler on 'The Big Lebowski'.



haha!! so funny! such a good movey DUUUUDE!