|
makron Registered: Jul 01, 2005 Total Posts: 398 Country: Singapore |
I've edited the title (for easier search) as some of the posts contained valuable information on the Leica 19mm version II. |
|
ovredal73 Registered: Jun 21, 2005 Total Posts: 2478 Country: Norway |
If you are going to keep using Canon for the forseeable future, I would adapt the lens to the camera. If you are contemplating chasing a FF digital Leica R eventually, I would adapt the camera. I have adapted a few of my (less expensive lenses than the Leica, but still quite a bit of money) like the Contax 35-70, 35/1.4, Nikkor 35/1.4 and Contax 85/1.4 to not hurt my 5D or 5D2. Mostly sanding down a rear lens protector pin or an edge touching the mirror etc. Maybe thatīs what needs to be done here as well? A rear lens protector pin is worthless anyway if you are careful with your handling of the lens. |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3035 Country: Australia |
We're lucky to have a Leica service centre here in Western Australia who have experience as fitters and joiners and make custom mounts for universities mounting cameras on telescopes/microscopes etc. When my 19/2.8 arrives I will be giving it to them to precisely machine the shroud and retaining ring down sufficiently to fit my 5D2 and get them to refinish/paint the machined part so it is not noticeably modified. |
|
Andi Dietrich Registered: Nov 13, 2005 Total Posts: 3801 Country: Bahamas |
Maybe you can make trade of your unaltered copy against one which already has been modified |
|
Conner999 Registered: Jan 22, 2006 Total Posts: 3521 Country: Canada |
Just modify the mirror. The 19 is awesome, but with VERY tight tolerances that can get buggered royally if ANY gunk from adapting the lens gets in there. |
|
Grant808 Registered: Sep 20, 2005 Total Posts: 2873 Country: United States |
I bought a copy modified for 1Ds2 (originally Guy Mancuso's) and still had to cut another millimeter to clear my 5D mirror. |
|
fastap Registered: Jan 20, 2009 Total Posts: 14 Country: Canada |
so when u guys test to see if a lens will clear the mirror you just slap it on and press the shutter and hope for the best? isint it kinda bad for the camera to have the shutter slam into the lens? or is it not hard enough to damage anything? |
|
Grant808 Registered: Sep 20, 2005 Total Posts: 2873 Country: United States |
Before you know what will clear your particular camera, I don't think there is any other way. If you have a lens that barely clears, you can measure it against the lens you would like to test first. But essentially, once you decide to try it...all you can do is hope for the best. Personally, I worry most about damaging rear elements. Canon will replace a shutter for a fee, and I could live with that if I damaged one. |
|
fastap Registered: Jan 20, 2009 Total Posts: 14 Country: Canada |
yea forsure, maybe theres something you could do to cover the rear element during testing |
|
Conner999 Registered: Jan 22, 2006 Total Posts: 3521 Country: Canada |
The swinging mirror really doesn't have enough force to damage itself and will graze/hit a rear element shroud *which most lenses have) vs any glass - and you'll get an error message. If so, turn off camera, remove lens, turn back on and mirror returns. |
|
makron Registered: Jul 01, 2005 Total Posts: 398 Country: Singapore |
Thanks for all the helpful responses, I appreciated them. Think I'll have to sleep on it for a while before deciding what to do. |
|
makron Registered: Jul 01, 2005 Total Posts: 398 Country: Singapore |
thrice wrote: |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3035 Country: Australia |
Just got the lens, and the mirror catches so that I get "half" pictures. I can turn on live view before mounting the lens and use live view with no problems though. Mine is the second optical formula, but it's the 3cam not ROM version. |
|
Conner999 Registered: Jan 22, 2006 Total Posts: 3521 Country: Canada |
Enjoy - it is a sweet lens. |
|
nsng Registered: Oct 06, 2005 Total Posts: 11 Country: Singapore |
makron wrote: |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3035 Country: Australia |
Mine is not the ROM, but it is the second optical formula (basically the ROM lens without the ROM connections). It works just fine in live view. |
|
Cinstance Registered: Oct 09, 2003 Total Posts: 3749 Country: United States |
I have modified nearly half a dozen of the 19's. Ironically my current one was not modded, because I had a mirror-modded 5D. |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3035 Country: Australia |
Yep, on the markII there is a thick plastic retainer under the mirror, and this is what rests on the rear shroud, without obscuring the rear element. ![]() Notice the square hood vignettes in the corners? This is straight out of the camera but it seems that the colour gets a little messed up by lightroom when the file is converted to jpeg... which is odd. It's much more saturated in lightroom, oh well. Here are some 100% crops from zone A, B and C, hopefully the new adapter helps with Zone C but it's not that bad really. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3035 Country: Australia |
Here are a couple of quick & nasty shots I took in midday light down at the lake while walking my dog. It's about 35C and 100% humidity today, disgusting. ![]() ![]() It appears that the vignetting is regardless of the hood. ![]() |