5D Mark II or used 1Ds Mark II?
/forum/topic/727705/0

end

elamont
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Total Posts: 971
Country: United States

Hey everyone,

wondering if anyone would have a recommendation between the 5D Mark II and 1Ds Mark II (used) for wedding work. Aside for resolution (16 is plenty), the only benefit of the 5D is the video. I see so many upsides to the 1Ds (AF, build, Vgrip included, same controls as my 1D Mark II, etc).

They are about the same in price.

Thoughts?



Tony Hoffer
Registered: Mar 14, 2008
Total Posts: 7496
Country: United States

Well the one benefit you will definitely see with the 5DII is ISO noise. I just shot a wedding and used 3200 and 6400 with confidence. Other than that, it sounds like you're leaning towards the 1Ds. You can't go wrong either way. You can buy a grip for the 5D though if need be.



PierreB
Registered: Feb 23, 2005
Total Posts: 4483
Country: United Kingdom

I have not used a 5D MkII but having used a 1DsMkII in the summer for a powerboating event, I was hooked. It really is a fine piece of kit. The only downside for wedding work may be the low light performance which, of course, the 5DMkII excels at. I was seeing noise in the shadows above ISO 400 but I guess that could be fixed with Noise Ninja or something similar.

I would suggest you try to borrow or rent one and give it a test run. There's nothing like a hands on trial.



sboerup
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Total Posts: 8869
Country: United States

I wouldn't count (personally) the 5D2 video as a benefit . . . unless you really know what you are doing with video work you'll be able to do it . . . which I doubt most of us on here would be.

I have 2x5D2 and couldn't be happier. Loved the 1Ds2 when I had them, great camera. I've found (from owning many many different Canon pro-bodies) that the 5D delivers enough AF performance for my needs, is plenty weather sealed, and I like the weight of the 5Ds. It's a winner in my book.



elamont
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Total Posts: 971
Country: United States

Thanks for all the feedback. I will probably go with the 5D2 if for no other reason than the lowlight capabilities. I dunno if its just my lot in life or what, but I ALWAYS get the weddings that take place in the darkest venues possible. Some around here have dark wood floors, walls, and ceilings. Cant even bounce a flash of em...

Thanks again.



Brad Barr
Registered: Feb 13, 2007
Total Posts: 1127
Country: United States

5d2 is hands down the choice here. It just produces better files.
bb



Marcus Watts
Registered: Oct 05, 2007
Total Posts: 2730
Country: United States

Better body or better files.

That's really your decision. For me the 5d2 would win.

I've never found the focus of the 5d to be a problem for shooting weddings though. If you do that would weigh in on your decision.



end