|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
So a little while back I said I'd write up a star trails tutorial.. well, it ended up being pretty long. It turns out there's a lot you have to think about, and writing it all down took up lots of space. I hope you find it helpful, and I would love to get some feedback, as I think I might want to try submitting something like this to some magazines or something to see if I can get it to go anywhere (suggestions most welcome.. I've never done that before!). "Rocks Racing Stars" ~ The Racetrack, Death Valley National Park The Tech: Canon 20D, 10-22mm Exposure: iso 400, f/5.6, 2.5 hours over 5x 30 minute increments (my first real attempt), started soon after twilight Enough with the poetry now, your question is of course, well, how do I actually photograph this incredible beauty? It’s likely you’ve tried, yet couldn’t quite capture the color, the delicate light dancing over the land around you, and the first twinkles of stars, and the subsequent circles traced out by the stars around Polaris. In this article I will share with you how to go about capturing that magic, from the preconception through to the finished product. Most of this article will concentrate on how to capture a stunning startrail photograph, though much of it is relevant to capturing that fleeting moment of twilight. This is a complex process involving more planning and technique than most photos, so sit tight and get ready to learn! Note: I use a mac, so all my photoshop directions are for a mac, they’re probably similar for a PC. The first step in creating a successful photograph is generally some sort of pre-visualization. The beauty of startrails and previsualization, is that they are very predictable. Eventually you will get a clear night at your desired location, and you’ll know exactly what those stars will do. Getting the right clouds, mist, or ethereal light requires more luck and patience to get exactly what you picture in your mind. And of course, once that happens, it will never happen quite that way again – it is unique. On every clear and calm night, however, startrails will look nearly identical to any other day (sure the constellations will be in different positions, but for nearly every application this won’t make a difference). As a result, a startrail photo can easily become cliché, the stars and sky will not be the unique part of your image. What will make your photo special, is where you chose to take, what the foreground is and how it relates to the circling heavens above. For me, startrails show three things: geometrical shapes, motion, and the revealing of an invisible force. As a result, I strive to find foregrounds that will resonate with those qualities, making for a final image that hopefully speaks to you on an emotional and/or intellectual level. |
|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
Planning and Preparation: |
|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
Collecting Starlight – the Exposure: ”Geometry of Motion” ~ Badwater Salt Flats, Death Valley National Park The Tech: Canon 5D, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 fisheye (with some distortion correction) Exposure: iso 400, f/5.6, 32x 5 min exposures blended, started at twilight Alternatively you can time your exposure such that at some point the moon casts light on the foreground, but the more moon, the less stars. Another option is to use ‘lightpainting’ – use a flashlight (or flash) to light up the foreground during the exposure. Getting this right takes practice, but you can get some neat effects. For a natural look I recommend using an LED light, as the blueish white balance works better with the night sky in many cases (of course, it depends on your sky). ”Essence of Time” ~ Bristlecone National Forest The Tech: Canon 5D, 17-40mm, LED headlamp Exposure: iso 400, f/5.6, about 25x 5 min exposures, started at twilight Lightpainting: In the last exposure I used iso 800 and used my headlamp to paint the tree from the side. It would also be good to note that air traffic is least in the early morning (1-3 am or so), so if you’re having trouble with planes, that might become a factor. Setting up the shot: So if you’re following my advice, you’re setting up your shot while it’s still light out, but you can’t see the stars then! Of course, if it’s dark and you can see the stars, then you can’t see the land very well, so getting a nice composition will be hard. The hardest ones to set up are those that including the north star, Polaris, in the frame. Often compositions work best with it in the middle, and of course not too high up in the picture you so get complete circles around Polaris. So how do you get Polaris in the right spot? That’s where your compass and map come into play. You need to point your camera to true north. The compass, however, points to magnetic north, which lies in Northern Canada near Ellesmere Island. The declination, found on your topo map, will tell you the difference in angle between true north and magnetic north. Using this and your compass you can find true north, now point your camera that way, and find yourself a nice composition (before it’s dark). Now, as soon as the stars start to twinkle you’ve got to work fast. You want to double-check your composition before committing 3 hours to it. So shoot a test shot of ~ 5 minutes (depending on the focal length), just long enough so you can see some rotation. This will help you find the north star, and just to double check it’s position, hopefully you’re not far off. It can be useful to note that if you can find the big dipper, the two stars marking the end of the dipper point to Polaris, and the last two stars in the little dipper’s handle point to it as well. |
|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
Shooting the Twilight: ”Twilight Blues” ~ Mt. Rainier National Park, WA The Tech: Canon 5D, 17-40mm Exposure: 4 exposure blend: 1. (for the foreground) iso 400, f/11, 2 minutes 2. (for the mountain) iso 400, f/11, 2 minutes, shifted focus from the foreground exposure 3. (for the sky) iso 400, f/11, 25 sec 4. (for the stars) iso 1600, f/4, 15 sec, shot 1 hour after the previous three Processing: first 3 layers blended normally, last layer in 'lighten mode'. Due to the poor quality of the stars, I went in and manually retouched the stars with a paintbrush to make them look pretty... now with a 16-35mm f/2.8 and 5DII hopefully I'll be able to get some better quality stars to start with Taking the Picture – Star Trail Techniques: With film you could simply flip up the mirror, go to bed, and come back a few hours later and you’d have yourself a photo (after making sure of the sunrise/sunset, moonrise/moonset, and picking a clear moonless night of course). With digital, there are some more hoops to jump through. So why use digital at all? With film there were problems with reciprocity, meaning the films sensitivity to various kinds of light changes with longer exposures, and it can be hard to predict unless you know your film well. But for really long exposures, it might make your life a lot easier. I like the control of digital, and while I have considered trying some film for these applications, I must admit that having grown up with digital, I’m no film user. Fortunately those hoops we have to jump through with digital are not insurmountable. Noise is the number one enemy you will face. Once you start to push your exposure beyond a few minutes, the noise starts to increase significantly – long exposure noise. Also, different parts of the camera will heat up and affect how the sensor works. Most (if not all) cameras will exhibit some kind of magenta colored bloom in a consistent spot (different for different cameras). There are a number of solutions to consider. As the temperature drops, the signal to noise ratio gets better, and your noise will decrease. So if it’s -15 degrees F outside, you might very well get away with a 2-hour straight exposure without much noise! But often times it’s not that cold (thankfully!). So for those nights you have two other options: long exposure noise reduction (available in most cameras, or it can be done manually using dark frames), or taking multiple exposures and stacking them. I have not found the long exposure noise reduction to be very effective at all, so I use multi-exposure stacking. Shooting Multiple Exposures: The idea here is to sequentially shoot lots of shorter exposures; the length of each individual exposure will depend on the tradeoff between noise and processing time/power required to assemble your final image. I find 5 minutes to be a nice number (so for a 2-hour exposure you’ll need 24 exposures). Note that for most cameras anything beyond 30 seconds needs to be done through the ‘bulb’ command. If you plan on trying this, I recommend getting a remote for you camera that lets you program such commands so you don’t have to manually sit there and hit the shutter (for Canon that would be the TC-80N3). For the TC-80N3 you’ll need to set the time between exposures to 1 second (it doesn’t shoot multiple exposures if you leave it at zero). Note: turn off long exposure noise reduction, and mirror lock up. You want as seamless a series of images as you can get for star trails. Power Constraints: I should note here that batteries don’t last forever. Your battery might only last you for an hour, or two at the most. Using a battery grip or external power supply like from http://www.digitalcamerabattery.com/, might be a good idea. Otherwise you have to be really quick with replacing a dead one! Cold temperatures will reduce their efficiency as well. |
|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
A Note on Raw Processing 32x 5 minute exposures taken at iso 400, f/5.6, with the Canon 5D and Sigma 15mm f/2.8 fisheye lens, stacked using lighten blend mode. After you resize to a normal web size (800 or so pixels in the longest dimension) you won’t really notice them, but in a nice print you will. You could sit there and use the clone tool to fix every gap, but if you have 25 exposures and 100 bright stars, that’s already 2,500 clone fixes – not something you want to do. There is one other possibility that sometimes works (only if you shot the circular pattern of the stars rotating around Polaris): 1. Duplicate your flattened image 2. On the duplicate image, select the entire image with the crop tool 3. Move the center of the crop box (there is a little cross hairs) to the center of rotation of your star trails. Choose this very carefully 4. Move your mouse to one of the corners, and rotate the image just a little. 5. Select this image, and paste it on top of the original 6. Set the blend mode to ‘lighten’ 7. Crop a little, or use the clone tool or layer masks to get rid of the white edges in the corners This only works if there is hardly any distortion in the picture, which doesn’t really happen with wide angles. It’s also really hard to get the center of rotation just right. Naively you might think that those gaps are there because of the slight break in time between exposures. For a long lens you might be right, but for an ultra wide angle, 1 second is insignificant. The gaps are there because of the blend mode, by using the ‘screen’ blend mode the gaps disappear! But, then the sky becomes much too bright, so the key is to use a clever combination of the two. Lighten Screen Blending (LSB) – Advanced Multi-exposure blending: This method overcomes many of the shortcomings of just using ‘lighten’ layers. It works best if you shoot raw. First, lower the exposure by 1-stop (alternatively you can do this in photoshop after you’re done). When doing your raw conversion use a ‘linear’ conversion. That means you will do no curves, levels, or contrast adjustments in your RAW conversion (for ACR set all the values except white balance and saturation/vibrance to zero, make sure to set the tone curve to linear as well). Otherwise you will be affecting each end of the star trail, making the gaps more pronounced. Save the files as Tiff or psd in a new folder. Load your files into a stack (using file-]scripts-]load files into stack), but do NOT convert them to a smart object. Now you’re going to perform a little algorithm, alternating the use of screen and lighten layers strategically to get rid of those little gaps. Now suppose you have the following layers: layer-1, layer-2, layer-3, layer-4 You want to duplicate each layer, except for the first and last: layer-1, layer-2-copy, layer-2, layer-3-copy, layer-3, layer-4 Now set layer-1 to blend mode ‘screen’, select it and layer-2-copy, and merge them (select both and hit command e, or go to layers->merge layers). This is why we reduced the exposure earlier, because now you’re essentially adding exposures. Set this new layer to ‘lighten’ blend mode. Now do the same for each successive pair, so set layer 2 to blend mode screen, and merge it with layer 3-copy, then set the new layer to lighten. After doing this for all your layers you will end up with a stack of layers all set to ‘lighten’ blend mode, and by strategically using the screen blend mode we have made sure each gap is filled in. Now flatten the image and go ahead and do your normal processing. The result? Here you go.. Same files as before, processed at -1 exposure in raw, and blended using the LSB method. No further adjustments. I don't really understand the other gaps and weird star lines, they're long than a single exposure, some I'm not sure what's happening.. The two gaps per trail you do see are when I had to replace my battery.. I need to go in and fix those all, oh boy! If you could have a low noise 2-3 hour exposure (ie. on a very cold night, or some time in the future with better cameras), you’d be better off doing that, why waste your time processing? A note on dark frames: If you want to get into astrophotography, I recommend you do some more research, and read a book. There are many techniques that are much better for getting detailed images of stars (not star trails), including the use of dark frames. I have not found dark frames to be useful with my cameras and techniques, but you might find them useful – I recommend you do a search on google. |
|
floris Registered: May 11, 2006 Total Posts: 4674 Country: United States |
Summary: |
|
Spool Registered: Apr 25, 2006 Total Posts: 39 Country: Australia |
wow what a great in depth tutorial, thanks so much. going to put it into practice this weekend. |
|
Daniel K Registered: Feb 07, 2007 Total Posts: 541 Country: United States |
What is your interval between shots? I did 15 min exposures with 20 second intervals and had small but noticeable gaps in my trails. I did the intervals shorter than what was recommended to me to allow time for the sensor to cool down. Does anyone know how long the sensor retains heat? I use a mark 3. |
|
hugh Registered: Jan 09, 2002 Total Posts: 29225 Country: United States |
Hello Floris, |
|
doigal Registered: Dec 20, 2004 Total Posts: 192 Country: Germany |
I'm reasonably sure someone has scripted or put the steps you described into an action for photoshop to chew through without you having to do all that work (might be helpful if you have 200+ 30sec shots!) |
|
Dneufarth Registered: May 31, 2008 Total Posts: 1003 Country: United States |
An excellent tutorial with excellent images, thanks so much for sharing, Derek |
|
jforkner Registered: Dec 02, 2008 Total Posts: 260 Country: United States |
Thanks for the great insight. Lovely pics, BTW. |
|
aFeinberg Registered: Mar 15, 2006 Total Posts: 3780 Country: United States |
holy ^@#$ what nuts pics. much love floris |
|
free2run Registered: Jan 14, 2005 Total Posts: 102 Country: United States |
Very nice and detailed article and outstanding shots. |
|
Ray Still Registered: Oct 10, 2008 Total Posts: 8050 Country: United States |
Great Tutorial these will definitely be put to use by me |
|
Chaz Registered: Mar 20, 2004 Total Posts: 916 Country: United States |
BRAVO! Clap-Clap-Clap!! An extremely well-written tutorial that I will want to use in the field. Thanks for the selfless, time-consuming effort and the beautiful photos illustrating the technique. |
|
thw2 Registered: Dec 27, 2004 Total Posts: 1954 Country: N/A |
Chaz wrote: |
|
dcad10 Registered: Aug 26, 2008 Total Posts: 292 Country: United States |
this is excellent, I've been looking for something just like this to help me get started shooting my own star trails. |
|
realkuhl Registered: Apr 22, 2003 Total Posts: 6808 Country: United States |
Awesome photos and excellent information to back them up!! Love the DV shots a lot....really well done! |