|
Chris Radley Registered: Jul 05, 2007 Total Posts: 45 Country: United Kingdom |
Hi, is this lens any good based on people's experiences? |
|
rsrsrs Registered: May 14, 2008 Total Posts: 591 Country: Germany |
hi, |
|
Chris Radley Registered: Jul 05, 2007 Total Posts: 45 Country: United Kingdom |
Thanks. |
|
Ed Sawyer Registered: May 08, 2007 Total Posts: 1991 Country: United States |
IQ is ok but nothing super special. Certainly not rokkor 58/1.2 quality or even 50 1.4 quality IMO. |
|
badastronaut Registered: Nov 05, 2005 Total Posts: 127 Country: Canada |
i have the 45mm f2, two actually since it was so cheap might as well buy a spare. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2015 Country: United States |
Sorry to bump an old thread, but is there any information on converting one of these to EOS? I recently acquired one for $20 and thought it'd be nice to use as a pancake on a 5D. I've heard rumors of something related to the Cogitech forum (which is down) and I can't find any information on how to do the conversion. |
|
trumpet_guy Registered: Jun 23, 2006 Total Posts: 3233 Country: United States |
It's small but not greatly smaller than a Contax CZ 50/1.7 and so I've never |
|
CVickery Registered: May 14, 2004 Total Posts: 2102 Country: Canada |
JimBuchanan described his approach once for me. It isn't easy and the lens probably doesn't have the IQ to make it worthwhile. The 45/2 I bought for $15Cdn is still a Minolta mount. If I happen across a MD>4/3 adapter some day that's cheap enough I may try it out on my friend's Oly. |
|
debuggerus Registered: Apr 25, 2008 Total Posts: 788 Country: United States |
Well, I really like my converted one .. I think it's a sleeper, especially so cheap. I think it is easier than the 50 1.4. Used a circular grinder, sanded down .5 mm. It's easy to sand since the MD mount is removable from the bottom base. I think you should try to convert it. Good luck.
|
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2015 Country: United States |
That looks great debuggerus. Any more samples? I also sent you a PM... |
|
JimU Registered: Jan 21, 2009 Total Posts: 457 Country: Canada |
i'd like to see more samples as well please. about 1028x768? |
|
debuggerus Registered: Apr 25, 2008 Total Posts: 788 Country: United States |
One correction: now that I look at the conversion, it is the same difficulty as the rokkor 50 1.4. I had to grind both the mount base and the M42-EOS adapter and adjusted infinity focus from the front in the end.
100% crop:
mounted on a 40D:
some more:
|
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2015 Country: United States |
Wow, I am impressed and now very interested in doing this conversion |
|
debuggerus Registered: Apr 25, 2008 Total Posts: 788 Country: United States |
I've completed another 45mm f2 conversion. This time I managed to record the process. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2015 Country: United States |
Thanks for posting that! Does anyone else have any experience with the 45mm on EOS? I'm going to attempt the conversion soon... |
|
matthewm Registered: Mar 06, 2008 Total Posts: 1329 Country: United States |
I really, really love this lens on my X700 so I think I'll keep it that way. Don't want to go cutting and gluing and messing around with a perfectly good lens. REALLY wanted this to use on my 5D, but I can't justify the trouble that it's most likely going to cause me. |
|
Makten Registered: Jul 14, 2008 Total Posts: 2892 Country: Sweden |
Lovely bokeh there! Just a trace of outlining of the blur discs, which makes it "interesting" but still smooth. |
|
Jim Schemel Registered: Oct 18, 2006 Total Posts: 3995 Country: United States |
Here is a set taken with my 45 Rokkor on a 5D |
|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
debuggerus wrote: |