They were a great couple and we had a blast shooting the wedding.

1-

Just a little hint to get you some more comments. If you're looking for comments and critique, put a little note and ask the community to help you out. I, personally, don't like to critique other people's images until they've asked. Good luck.

One more thing... Put numbers on the pictures (next to under or over), this way they can say, (I like #5 or I dislike #5).

Looks like you did a great job of lighting the reception!

Some critiques for you:
1. A little too much vignette in some of these for me (although it's more noticeable since they're small photos)
2. A few too many of them are shot from your eye-level. I would challenge you to get lower or higher to give the images more interesting perspective.

Secondlaw wrote:
One more thing... Put numbers on the pictures (next to under or over), this way they can say, (I like #5 or I dislike #5).



scott shoemake wrote:
Just a little hint to get you some more comments. If you're looking for comments and critique, put a little note and ask the community to help you out. I, personally, don't like to critique other people's images until they've asked. Good luck.

Done and Done.

Sorry about that.

Tony Hoffer wrote:
Looks like you did a great job of lighting the reception!

Some critiques for you:
1. A little too much vignette in some of these for me (although it's more noticeable since they're small photos)
2. A few too many of them are shot from your eye-level. I would challenge you to get lower or higher to give the images more interesting perspective.

Thanks Tony, I'll def. try that out at my future weddings.

I appreciate your comments.

Were you 2nd shooting? A lot of the portraits are of peoples backs or of them not looking at the camera. I like the detail shots.

Andrew Welsh wrote:
Were you 2nd shooting? A lot of the portraits are of peoples backs or of them not looking at the camera. I like the detail shots.

No, these were just my favorites of the day. There's a lot more that I didn't post that are your more 'traditional' photos.

Andrew Welsh wrote:
Were you 2nd shooting? A lot of the portraits are of peoples backs or of them not looking at the camera. I like the detail shots.

I was a second shooter. It was great and fun as seeing it was my 1st time actually shooting a wedding. I've always been the sort of drunk having fun. lol

WOOT! Some of my pictures were used. Keep it up Jorge.

few thoughts-some nice shots in there but i would suggest really getting in the mix-looks like you're standing a ways off from them and there's no connection to the moment/action-you could either use a slightly longer focal length or if you're shooting wider, get in closer-either way, fill the frame a bit more

for silhouettes, such as #36, think about where the light is-you placed their faces in front of the door frame, thus blocking the backlighting you were trying to utilize-moving them two feet either way would solve that

29 is a very nice capture-like it-i also like shots like #22-shows you're looking for action

hope this is useful

daniel