|
Chris Dees Registered: Dec 24, 2002 Total Posts: 2878 Country: Netherlands |
Someone at DPR wrote the framerate of the D3x is 5fps (FX mode) with 12 bits and only 1.8fps with 14 bits (a bit like the D300). |
|
BenV Registered: Jan 01, 2008 Total Posts: 5480 Country: United States |
this was all I could find :-( |
|
lou f Registered: Nov 18, 2005 Total Posts: 5036 Country: Ireland |
same crap with the sony. |
|
Chris Dees Registered: Dec 24, 2002 Total Posts: 2878 Country: Netherlands |
louis fusco wrote: |
|
Bruce Sawle Registered: Sep 26, 2006 Total Posts: 3369 Country: United States |
I posted this a few days ago regarding this issue. Seems rather sneaky if true. |
|
Steve Perry Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2989 Country: United States |
I was looking at the specs on the PDF file and this is what's listed: |
|
Bruce Sawle Registered: Sep 26, 2006 Total Posts: 3369 Country: United States |
yes the 1DS MKIII does 5 frames per second in 14bit. |
|
Steve Perry Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2989 Country: United States |
Whew, Rob says we're good: |
|
James R Registered: Feb 25, 2006 Total Posts: 3985 Country: United States |
Another DPR inaccuracy cleared up. I'm always amazed how people can make claims about cameras they have never used. |
|
Avi B Registered: Dec 07, 2006 Total Posts: 6405 Country: Canada |
Well, it is DPR |
|
Engelsen Registered: Oct 15, 2007 Total Posts: 25 Country: Norway |
In DX crop mode, shooting rates of up to 11 fps (D3) and |
|
bellyface Registered: Mar 17, 2003 Total Posts: 4906 Country: United States |
i doubt pro's will buy the D3x with the intention of using it as a sports machine gun. This is exactly why there was always a choice... D1h/D1x, D2h/D2x, etc. etc., I wasn't expecting the X to be überfast @ the throat where it swallows those huge files, it was bound to bottleneck there... expect a buffer upgrade... |
|
Engelsen Registered: Oct 15, 2007 Total Posts: 25 Country: Norway |
Agree completely. I don´t think it was ever supposed to be neither fast nor a high iso camera. For that the D3 is out there. |
|
Chris Dees Registered: Dec 24, 2002 Total Posts: 2878 Country: Netherlands |
James R wrote: |
|
Tim Ashton Registered: Dec 27, 2006 Total Posts: 2643 Country: Australia |
Chris Dees wrote: |
|
Nick G Walker Registered: Jan 25, 2004 Total Posts: 213 Country: United Kingdom |
To prevent any further arguments the frame rate is 1.8 in 14 bit. |
|
Chris Dees Registered: Dec 24, 2002 Total Posts: 2878 Country: Netherlands |
Ouch, so it looks to be tru |
|
Sanlameer Registered: Jun 27, 2006 Total Posts: 434 Country: South Africa |
The shutter lag also goes from 40ms to 60 ms in 14 bit. |
|
Steve Perry Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2989 Country: United States |
Well, that kind of sucks if it's true. It's not the end of the world, but dang, you'd think Nikon could at least be on par with Canon after releasing a competing model a year late. At least the AF should work! |
|
gman1339 Registered: Jul 17, 2006 Total Posts: 2465 Country: United States |
I'd bet the 16 BIT pipeline has something to do with it. They are going after the ultimate image quality for a 35mm dSLR. |