Different Post Work - Enchanted Dress - No TOOBz?
/forum/topic/701743/0

1
2 end

jeremy_clay
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Total Posts: 9073
Country: Canada

Different post processing styles here, trying some different things once again. I'm pretty confident the 'Toning Experiment' shot doesn't work..too much red. Any guesses to the value of the dress?

Vanity Fair-ish


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Strong Black & White


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Very Moody


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Teh Apple


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Teh Apple II


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Snapshot taken on our couch


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Toning Experiment


This image is copyrighted by the owner





Construction Stuff


This image is copyrighted by the owner




hardlyboring
Registered: Apr 19, 2008
Total Posts: 5875
Country: United States

Mind sharing how you lit and processed some of these? They are great, you are a very versatile shooter. Been loving the work.
doug



Evan Baines
Registered: Jan 15, 2007
Total Posts: 4581
Country: United States

Really dig the first three JC.

Processing is spot on for those.



trillium
Registered: Sep 01, 2004
Total Posts: 770
Country: United States

Very nice.

How did you ever resist the temptation to spotcolor apple 2?



JLinkowitz
Registered: May 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1644
Country: United States

You need a new model Jerm Just kidding buddy, I know she's your girlfriend.

#2 is an awesome shot



jeremy_clay
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Total Posts: 9073
Country: Canada

JLinkowitz wrote:
You need a new model Jerm Just kidding buddy, I know she's your girlfriend.

#2 is an awesome shot


Hell yes she is. I think the snapshot shot titled '..on our couch' would give it away.



scott shoemake
Registered: Apr 21, 2007
Total Posts: 1710
Country: United States

1,2,3 make me happy. They are good all around. The processing is nice, mind sharing what you did? PM is cool.



PhotoDude79
Registered: Jan 29, 2008
Total Posts: 1214
Country: United States

2 is tha shizzle.....I love those high contrast B & W. 1+ for how you processed these.



katiedis
Registered: Jan 01, 2006
Total Posts: 965
Country: United States

I like the toning experiment very much. not too much red at all.



Brian Lingle
Registered: Aug 13, 2005
Total Posts: 2304
Country: United States

I like one and 2 a lot. The background is kinda busy and distracting in 2, but it an interesting image. The apple ones are fun and I like the lighting a lot in the one on your couch. Not enough separation between the top of her head and the bg in that one, but I suspect it shows up better at full res and in print.



Sam Hassas
Registered: Jul 11, 2007
Total Posts: 5964
Country: United States

Wow man. I really like the adding of reds in your work. Love the earth tones as well but these.....man. I'm surprised the couch shot hasn't received more love. My fave in the set Jerm. I'll go as far as to say that these are among the best I've seen from you bud.

~Sam



SingleMalt
Registered: Nov 26, 2006
Total Posts: 683
Country: United States

Evan Baines wrote:
Really dig the first three JC.

Processing is spot on for those.


+1.



brandonwong
Registered: Jun 11, 2008
Total Posts: 622
Country: United States

Awesome set. For such a flamboyant dress like that, anything except glamorous Vogue type shots wouldn't have worked IMO.

First three are top notch.



jeremy_clay
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Total Posts: 9073
Country: Canada

Thank you all for the kudos. I must admit I'm a bit suprised, I felt the apple shots were much stronger? Anyone?

PS - any bets on the gown's worth?



Conradp04
Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Total Posts: 800
Country: United States

hey jeremy, can i have your girl as a model?!?! just kidding bud, really nice and edgy processing


hmmm and about the dress? Looks expensive from the post, but I'd value it at 49.999999



Conradp04
Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Total Posts: 800
Country: United States

oops I meant to say borrow your girl...lol



jeremy_clay
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Total Posts: 9073
Country: Canada

jeremy_clay wrote:
Thank you all for the kudos. I must admit I'm a bit suprised, I felt the apple shots were much stronger? Anyone?



Shameless bump for opinions on this.



dsouzl
Registered: Oct 28, 2003
Total Posts: 952
Country: Canada

Sweet work bro! My hands-down fav is #3!! The second apple shot looks a little weird to me. I think it's because the dress "shoulder" is closer in the foreground and because of the angle of the shot...my first reaction was that the arm holding the apple was only a foot long.

The couch shot also rocks! LOVE the lighting. Are you controlling spill with a light modifier...or using PS magic on the BG?

I also like the toning experiment...but I consistently OD on PS effects...so consider the source!



SingleMalt
Registered: Nov 26, 2006
Total Posts: 683
Country: United States

jeremy_clay wrote:
Thank you all for the kudos. I must admit I'm a bit suprised, I felt the apple shots were much stronger? Anyone?



Not for me. They're fine, but not, IMHO as solid as the first three.



jeremy_clay
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Total Posts: 9073
Country: Canada

dsouzl wrote:
Sweet work bro! My hands-down fav is #3!! The second apple shot looks a little weird to me. I think it's because the dress "shoulder" is closer in the foreground and because of the angle of the shot...my first reaction was that the arm holding the apple was only a foot long.

The couch shot also rocks! LOVE the lighting. Are you controlling spill with a light modifier...or using PS magic on the BG?

I also like the toning experiment...but I consistently OD on PS effects...so consider the source!


Thanks Lew - couch shot was controlled with barn doors and a 2 pieces of cardboard since my b/d's are awful, but PS'ed as well for a bit more contrast. Thanks for your explanation on the apple shot, it's appreciated and not something I saw myself!


SingleMalt wrote:

Not for me. They're fine, but not, IMHO as solid as the first three.


Thank you for the feedback. Seems pretty unanimous the first 3 are scratchin' people where they itch much more.



DB
Registered: Apr 04, 2007
Total Posts: 4842
Country: United States

I'm dying to know if this is a somewhat new gown, or someone's 80s gown you got at Goodwill (do they have those in Canada??).

I'm digging the Vanity Fair shoot and the construction shoot. Vanity Fair shoot shot with a strobe and modifier of some sort? Like Umbrella? Or you have a really nice window next to the couch.



the_rebel
Registered: Oct 26, 2005
Total Posts: 1188
Country: Canada

1st one works really well.
It begs to have her on some vintage furniture and IMO would finish off the already really good shot nicely.

Deb, there are Goodwill's in Canada. Never actually found any wedding dresses there. (none worth shooting at least)
Craigslist is really good for finding deals.
I am going to assume it's an older dress, and the shoulder fluff suggests it.
Most modern Gothic gowns don't have the fluffy shoulders...

I could be wrong :S
Cheers,
Dan



DB
Registered: Apr 04, 2007
Total Posts: 4842
Country: United States

Dude -- they have some of the ugliest wedding dresses ever at our goodwills here. I should know - I've been commissioned by family members to drop some off! Yeah, the shoulder fluff is screaming 80s.



Scott Mosher
Registered: Oct 23, 2006
Total Posts: 1409
Country: United States

They look awsome!

So were you trying to give your gf a hint by having her pose in a wedding dress?



Sahid Limon
Registered: Jan 24, 2007
Total Posts: 2128
Country: United States

They look great, especially the first few. Lighting on the vanity, moody, red, and couch shots are phenomenal. My criticism would be on the last one. I'm guessing you're going for the urban look, but for me, the tones on her face seems off. For some reason, it seems like the top right part of her face had more highlight when comparing the rest of the image. Just my .02.



1
2 end