|
yellowducky Registered: Sep 18, 2005 Total Posts: 1080 Country: China |
Hi all, |
|
hugh Registered: Jan 09, 2002 Total Posts: 29225 Country: United States |
The effectiveness of a CP depends on the angle to the light source. Right angles are the most effective with the effect decreasing as the angle to/from the sources decreases. Shooting into or away from the light source, one typically only gets the stop or so of neutral density except for the CP effect that might obtain in reflection areas. A common problem with wide lenses is that they see such a wide area of the sky that an obvious gradient is visible. My personal preference is to reserve the CP for controlling reflections and use other techniques for managing the density of the blue in skies. Many will disagree |
|
Jeffrey Registered: Nov 12, 2002 Total Posts: 8067 Country: United States |
moved to the appropriate forum. |
|
yellowducky Registered: Sep 18, 2005 Total Posts: 1080 Country: China |
Sorry Jeffrey, I figured since I was talking specifically about a wide angle lens and landscapes that it was the right spot initially. |
|
gtseng Registered: Oct 22, 2004 Total Posts: 2 Country: United States |
As I'm sure others will point out, the problem with using a CP on a wide angle lens is the light your camera sees is not uniformly polarized across areas. When light gets diffracted through different substances or off different materials (such as different gas compositions and dust in the air), the polarization angle changes relative to the camera. This results in various effects of the CP on wide sky shots. |
|
trenchmonkey Registered: Oct 22, 2004 Total Posts: 29706 Country: United States |
I'll turn the CirPol to max effect, then back off a bit. The blues will be more uniform for the most part. |