|
omarlyn Registered: Feb 19, 2004 Total Posts: 3526 Country: United States |
I was quietly reviewing the tech-specs on the 5DII and I was surprised to see that it takes a completely new battery (LP-E6) and it is NOT backward compatible with the BP-11 series batteries. Of course, this also necesitates the need for a new battery grip too (BG-E6). In all the talk about the new 5DII, I completely missed the battery/grip info. I'm never not one to post threads complaing about gear, but I don't see why Canon couldn't make both batteries cross-compatible as they are virtually identical in size. This is really the ONLY thing that has really bothered me about Canon over the years...their lack of back-ward compatibility with accessories. So I guess the REAL cost of the 5DII will be closer to 3K when the 'new' grip and extra 'new' batteries are added. |
|
monochrome Registered: Aug 24, 2007 Total Posts: 2747 Country: United States |
yeah, like no other company upgrades their accessories. Guess you never bought Sony Electronics. I have three different camcorders from them ALL with different size batteries. |
|
Stunnaz Registered: Apr 11, 2007 Total Posts: 1150 Country: United States |
The new battery provides more info to the user... and is higher in capacity. I assume video will use up quite a bit of power. |
|
bluetsunami Registered: Sep 03, 2008 Total Posts: 937 Country: United States |
As Stunnaz stated, higher capacity to facilitate recording of video. |
|
Rubber Soul Registered: Dec 12, 2006 Total Posts: 636 Country: United States |
bluetsunami wrote: |
|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
bluetsunami wrote: |
|
musclepics Registered: Sep 05, 2008 Total Posts: 822 Country: Canada |
Rubber Soul wrote: |
|
Lars Johnsson Registered: Jun 29, 2003 Total Posts: 28158 Country: Thailand |
omarlyn wrote: |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 6965 Country: Netherlands |
Lars Johnsson wrote: |
|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
Daan, I don't think that would have been possible. The new battery has recessed contact points, to lessen the chance of accidental dischard when in stroage. That's not Canon's design, it's the standard industry design for this new generation of battery. |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 6965 Country: Netherlands |
Cableaddict wrote: |
|
el_hoppy Registered: Feb 09, 2006 Total Posts: 969 Country: Sweden |
omarlyn wrote: |
|
victorXT Registered: Jul 21, 2006 Total Posts: 227 Country: Netherlands |
The only way to do that is using the different battery grips and penlites. |
|
EOS20 Registered: Mar 06, 2005 Total Posts: 12853 Country: Australia |
el_hoppy wrote: |
|
GeorgeK-NJ Registered: Feb 12, 2006 Total Posts: 1380 Country: United States |
I've got 3 different types of batteries for my DSLR's and 2 different types for my P&S, all Canon. Something you just got to live with. Next DSLR will be something different again!! |
|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
Daan B wrote: |
|
el_hoppy Registered: Feb 09, 2006 Total Posts: 969 Country: Sweden |
EOS20 wrote: |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 6965 Country: Netherlands |
Cableaddict wrote: |
|
Xavier Rival Registered: Jul 21, 2004 Total Posts: 3855 Country: France |
I think the only reason is that they wanted the battery to provide information to the user. Adding that additional information is a good decision, but it makes it quite painful for people who like to have two cameras like a 50D and a 5DmkII. |