|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
RalphJ wrote: |
|
Napalm Registered: Jan 13, 2005 Total Posts: 606 Country: United Kingdom |
Cableaddict wrote: |
|
Aragosh Registered: Apr 12, 2002 Total Posts: 172 Country: South Africa |
And why can't a still photographer not be impressed with video? Its only 30fps instead of 3.9fps not so. |
|
RalphJ Registered: Aug 22, 2005 Total Posts: 948 Country: United States |
Cableaddict wrote: Oh boy! A still photographer, (who has a deal with Canon, BTW) is ga-ga over the video performance of this camera! |
|
Cableaddict Registered: Jun 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3704 Country: United States |
You guys just don't get it. You literally are not capable of understanding my point. |
|
dcmiller Registered: May 21, 2002 Total Posts: 3643 Country: United States |
Cableaddict wrote: |
|
RyanFlynn Registered: Dec 15, 2005 Total Posts: 2250 Country: United States |
The 12-minute per clip limitation is completely fine. Have you ever seen a film where there's more than 12 minutes in one unbroken cut? They always edit away after a few seconds to a few minutes. |
|
maverick666 Registered: Aug 16, 2008 Total Posts: 725 Country: N/A |
Cableaddict wrote: |