|
BenFPhotog Registered: Jun 21, 2008 Total Posts: 173 Country: United Kingdom |
I've decided I jump from Canon (1D mkI, Sigma 24-60 f/2.8 and Sigma 70-200 f/2.8) and have settled on getting a D300 in the next few months. I shoot a lot of low light work (concerts, events, occasional wedding) as well as a few landscapes and portraits. I prefer using primes for the gorgeous bokeh, and have my eye on the following few lenses: |
|
R. Francois Registered: Jun 12, 2006 Total Posts: 4357 Country: Netherlands |
i'd go for at least a tokina 50-135. That's so awesome |
|
BenFPhotog Registered: Jun 21, 2008 Total Posts: 173 Country: United Kingdom |
Hmm I was thinking about that. How about the Tokina 50-135 and the 12-24 f/4 (or Sigma 10-20)? |
|
williamkazak Registered: Jun 08, 2006 Total Posts: 4071 Country: United States |
I am using the 35mm F2AFD instead of a 50mm. I think it is a better lens. |
|
chemprof Registered: Jan 12, 2004 Total Posts: 4432 Country: United States |
I don't have the 35 (I use a Sigma 30), but I agree that the 85 f/1.8 AF-D is a superb (and inexpensive) piece of glass. I do also like my Nikon 105 Micro (non AF-S), which I got from William, by the way. |
|
R. Francois Registered: Jun 12, 2006 Total Posts: 4357 Country: Netherlands |
BenFPhotog wrote: |
|
BenFPhotog Registered: Jun 21, 2008 Total Posts: 173 Country: United Kingdom |
Thanks guys. When I put down the money for one I will pick up a 50 f/1.8 and 85 f/1.8, and will get the Sigma later on. |
|
Kerry Pierce Registered: Feb 01, 2004 Total Posts: 2727 Country: United States |
I really like the 105 f/2 and assume the 135 f/2 would be just as nice, but it's rather expensive for your budget. The 85 f/1.8 is a really nice alternative for price considerations. |