|
RGS65 Registered: Oct 20, 2005 Total Posts: 3831 Country: United States |
Your thought always appreciated, ![]() |
|
Alan Young Registered: Jan 19, 2007 Total Posts: 1282 Country: United Kingdom |
Very, Very nice |
|
PaulC Registered: Dec 18, 2005 Total Posts: 1988 Country: Canada |
Very nice Rob, really enjoyable. Great conversion |
|
glyons Registered: Apr 09, 2008 Total Posts: 775 Country: Austria |
yup, worth getting up early for |
|
Sam Bortol Registered: Sep 26, 2007 Total Posts: 1247 Country: United States |
Really well done |
|
tomandmarj Registered: Jan 02, 2007 Total Posts: 1539 Country: United States |
nice composition; interesting that the focus of each thistle is different . . better or worse? |
|
Seth Tower Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2614 Country: United States |
I like it. Very odd bokeh, though. |
|
Seth Tower Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2614 Country: United States |
tomandmarj wrote: |
|
RGS65 Registered: Oct 20, 2005 Total Posts: 3831 Country: United States |
70-200 f2.8 IS at f4 Whats weird bout it Seth - it looks perfect to me? I added film grain here, is that what you mean? |
|
SKYWESTR Registered: Feb 18, 2005 Total Posts: 1204 Country: United States |
I think Seth may be talking about the mix of lines and highlights within the bokeh (the nice round spots of light). I like it, although the highlights can get a little distracting within an otherwise smooth bokeh. good conversion as well. |
|
Seth Tower Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 2614 Country: United States |
SKYWESTR wrote: |
|
RGS65 Registered: Oct 20, 2005 Total Posts: 3831 Country: United States |
Ok. I think the "lines" are other grass strands since they don't appear in any other images with this lens. Also the drops here are backlight water drops so there is probably some diffraction going on as the backlight passes through the droplets themselves to the lens, no? Thanks. |