Comparing bokeh on 50's manual focus lenses.
/forum/topic/665563/0

end

voeboe
Registered: Jun 24, 2008
Total Posts: 21
Country: Australia

I used a tripod and custom white balance.
Shots are in JPG. No post processing of any kind.
Contrast, Sharpness, Saturation are set to "0" on my K10D.
Image Tone is set to Natural.

SMC Pentax-A 50mm f1.7 @f1.7
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f2.8 @f.2.8 (borrowed from a friend)
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Industar-50-2 @f3.5
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Volna 50mm f2.8 @2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Helios-77M @1.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Mamiya Sekor 50mm f2 @f2
This image is copyrighted by the owner

MC Pentacon 50mm f1.8 @f1.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Helios-44-2 @f2
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Mamiya Sekor 55mm f1.8 @1.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Vivitar 55mm f2.8 Macro @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


I personally prefer the Volna-9. The OOF highlight rings are not that harsh.

Also noticed that the Industar-50-2 and the Carl Zeiss Jenna Tessar bokeh looks very similar. AFAIK these lenses share the same Tessar optical formula.



mh2000
Registered: Oct 06, 2005
Total Posts: 6632
Country: N/A

The Volna-9 does look nice here. For a tiny pancake, the I-50-2 is pleasing to my eye, probably being less sharp wide open than CZJ Tessar helps for bokeh. Thanks for posting.

Here are some informal test shots I did along the same lines...

http://www.markhahnphotography.com/russian/f28_lens_tests/normal_lens_tests28.htm



cogitech
Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Total Posts: 9797
Country: Canada

I like the Volna, as well. I'm seen similar comparisons where the Volna has distinguished itself from the group in the same way.



voeboe
Registered: Jun 24, 2008
Total Posts: 21
Country: Australia

Here are some more..
The Pentacon and the CZJ Tessar allow close focus up to 0.33m and 0.35m respectively.
So in this comparsion all the lenses are at around 35cm distance from the test object.

MC Pentacon 50mm f1.8 @f1.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Vivitar 55mm f2.8 Macro @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Volna 50mm f2.8 @2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f2.8 @f.2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Again I prefer the look of the Volna-9. It's bokeh is smoother than the rest and the highlight circles are not that harsh.



voeboe
Registered: Jun 24, 2008
Total Posts: 21
Country: Australia

For those who are interested in f/2.8 shots, I already took them but did not post them earlier, so here they are now:

MC Pentacon 50mm f1.8 @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Pentax 50mm f1.7 @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

MC Pentacon 50mm f1.8 @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Mamiya Sekor 55mm f1.8 @2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


Mamiya Sekor 50mm f2 @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


Helios-77M @2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


Helios-44-2 @f2.8
This image is copyrighted by the owner


I notice that at f/2.8 the Helios-44-2 has the roundest bokeh among the rest of the faster (f/2 and faster) lenses and that's because of the 8 blades aperture.


One of the reason I did this comparison is that we usually see bokeh from individual lenses but it is not very often that we get a comparison of multiple 50s.



end