|
Tom Spader Registered: May 24, 2007 Total Posts: 426 Country: United States |
I saw this mentioned in another thread with a different subject, so I thought I'd give it's own. |
|
Lance Lee Registered: Sep 27, 2005 Total Posts: 977 Country: Canada |
Oh yes, you need to process each image you are giving to the couple, even if it is 600. When I say process I mean a straightforward RAW processing in LR, DPP, ACR, whatever. It doesn't need to take that long. I'm guessing it takes me as long to edit from 1500 down to 600, as it does to process the 600. In LR, the vast majority of adjustments are: exposure, brightness, recovery, and sometimes fill light or blacks. After I'm done, I'll usually go through and play with a few, try different techniques, but that is not required. |
|
j.curtis Registered: May 02, 2004 Total Posts: 5563 Country: United States |
Lance Lee wrote: |
|
Tom Spader Registered: May 24, 2007 Total Posts: 426 Country: United States |
Thanks for the quick replies and a couple of follow ups on my first question. |
|
Tom Spader Registered: May 24, 2007 Total Posts: 426 Country: United States |
OK I apologize that I'm bumping my own thread, but I'm just putting together a proof book and web gallery and was hoping for at least the answer to the choices of bw and post processing. If you have that one image that you want to turn bw or be a little heavier handed on the post processing, when you make up the proofs/gallery do you also offer that same image straight up with just the normal crop, tone, adjustments. Thanks and I realize it's a holiday for some of us, but want this thing outta here by tomorrow. |
|
McGrattan Registered: Jun 11, 2008 Total Posts: 198 Country: Canada |
IMO, if you're not 100% on the B&W or PP, its not alot of extra work to include a "safe version". |
|
technocraft Registered: May 14, 2005 Total Posts: 2927 Country: United States |
Tom Spader wrote: |