|
Ariithka Registered: Jun 06, 2008 Total Posts: 80 Country: Australia |
Olympus Trip 35 w/ 40mm Zuiko f2.8 |
|
Sirfishalot Registered: Dec 23, 2004 Total Posts: 3348 Country: United States |
Pentax SMC FA*250-600/5.6 ![]() ![]() Pentax SMC FA*80-200/2.8 ![]() ![]() JayT |
|
Mike Ganz Registered: Sep 06, 2006 Total Posts: 1778 Country: United States |
Taken with Sigma 150/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro on 5D: ![]() ![]() ![]() Edited by Mike Ganz on Jul 04, 2008 at 12:19 PM GMT Edited by Mike Ganz on Jul 04, 2008 at 12:54 PM GMT |
|
telyt Registered: Mar 01, 2004 Total Posts: 1126 Country: United States |
A few samples made with the Leica 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt, all at f/4:
Edited by telyt on Jul 05, 2008 at 09:53 AM GMT |
|
Andi Dietrich Registered: Nov 13, 2005 Total Posts: 3801 Country: Bahamas |
Jonas B wrote: ![]() What is wrong with the bokeh, not enough blur? |
|
PSquared63 Registered: Oct 25, 2004 Total Posts: 1721 Country: United States |
How about a double blur? Background blur and motion blur from panning. ![]() |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
JayT, the Pentax SMC FA*80-200/2.8, and its shorter sibling, are good examples of lenses loved by many and at the same time leaving others, like me, cold. |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
Andi Dietrich wrote: |
|
koenrutten Registered: May 30, 2006 Total Posts: 215 Country: Netherlands |
I think it's mostly about the relative subject to background distance, lens quality is a close second. |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
A processed one with the Pentax FA31/1.8: ![]() |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
koenrutten wrote: |
|
robsteve Registered: Sep 07, 2005 Total Posts: 1696 Country: Canada |
You can't forget the Noctilux, king of Bokeh ![]() ![]() Close up using an extension tube. I think it may have been f1.2.
|
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 15160 Country: Australia |
135 f/2L @ f/2 ![]() @ f/2.5 ![]() MP-E 65 f/2.8 @ f/11 ![]() Sigma 150 f/2.8 @ f/4 ![]() |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
Brainiac; I posted some unprocessed Leica images for you in the very first reply at page 1. I think it was in the Siggy50 thread you commented on the Leica bokeh to be too soft, or too little edgy. Do the posted samples make you happier? |
|
Lotusm50 Registered: Sep 26, 2005 Total Posts: 5896 Country: United States |
This is from the Zeiss N 100mm f2.8 Marko Sonnar. It reverses what you would normally or conventionally choose to have in focus and what you would have out of focus. ![]() |
|
telyt Registered: Mar 01, 2004 Total Posts: 1126 Country: United States |
brainiac wrote: |
|
Daniel Goller Registered: Sep 10, 2006 Total Posts: 512 Country: United States |
From all the samples it seems 135mm and anything goes. |
|
voeboe Registered: Jun 24, 2008 Total Posts: 21 Country: Australia |
What about these? Is this a good bokeh? |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
brainiac wrote: ![]() Blotchy noise and such is down to the small Olympus sensor, the crop is around 60-70% size. Regards, |
|
s23chang Registered: Jul 17, 2006 Total Posts: 923 Country: United States |
How about some non macro nad non close up shots? |
|
Spyro P. Registered: Mar 24, 2008 Total Posts: 1353 Country: Australia |
Pixel Perfect wrote: |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
voeboe wrote: |
|
Jonas B Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 1594 Country: Sweden |
Daniel Buck wrote: |
|
Spyro P. Registered: Mar 24, 2008 Total Posts: 1353 Country: Australia |
Jonas, I just realised what you did in the OP, thanks for that |
|
robsteve Registered: Sep 07, 2005 Total Posts: 1696 Country: Canada |
s23chang wrote: |