Canon EF100mm f/2.8 macro lens Question...
/forum/topic/644891/0

end

JLinkowitz
Registered: May 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1009
Country: United States

Hey guys,
Is this a decent lens to walk around with for the cost, besides the use of details? Looking to have a lens on the 2nd body or on my wifes camera. Right now I've got the 17-40 f/4, 70-200 2.8, and a 50mm 1.8 that I bring with me. Looking at the 24-70 2.8 but holding out a bit longer. All bodies are crop factor.



Saad Syed
Registered: Jan 24, 2007
Total Posts: 806
Country: United States

Most macro lenses are generally slower in the AF department. Most are, generally speaking, ultra sharp. If you have enough light you should be good, however, you might have difficulty keeping up with moving targets in low light.



JLinkowitz
Registered: May 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1009
Country: United States

Thanks Saad...



tcamper
Registered: Sep 20, 2005
Total Posts: 1570
Country: United States

It's definitely one of the last lenses I would put on my camera and consider a "walk-around" lens.

Tad



tcamper
Registered: Sep 20, 2005
Total Posts: 1570
Country: United States

It's sharp! That's what it does.........besides getting close. Get an 85/1.8 or 100/2 if you want to walk around with it.



JLinkowitz
Registered: May 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1009
Country: United States

Is it me or most of these sweet ring shots coming off the 100 2.8?



Tizedesh
Registered: Aug 29, 2007
Total Posts: 190
Country: Australia

Problem is it's narrow on a crop body for regular work. Yet not very "tele" as such.

Good to shoot at person or car size objects from about 8-15 meters (25-50 foot). Not very fast in the Aperture dep't. The difference between f/2.8 and f/2.0 is big.

However IQ wise it's a hidden red head.

This image is copyrighted by the owner


This image is copyrighted by the owner


XTi made



Evan Baines
Registered: Jan 15, 2007
Total Posts: 1915
Country: United States

Love the 100macro, but with the slower AF, your crop factor and the relatively slow 2.8, I wouldn't consider it a "walk around" lens.

That said, I use mine for both my commercial and wedding jewelry work extensively.



JLinkowitz
Registered: May 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1009
Country: United States

Thanks for everyones posts....I'm going to hold off a bit longer on it as I've done alright thus far with the ring shots and I'm looking for a more walk around general use lens.

Thanks again.



scott shoemake
Registered: Apr 21, 2007
Total Posts: 856
Country: United States

85 1.8 is in that budget range and rocks my socks.



uzet1
Registered: Mar 19, 2005
Total Posts: 13
Country: Israel

That lens is exe for lots of thing
but is slow focusing in bad light cond.
and might be too sharp (if there is somethig like that) for portrets

PEACE



bacilonur
Registered: Aug 14, 2006
Total Posts: 1103
Country: United States

Get an 85 and some extension tubes.



Jim Schemel
Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Total Posts: 1012
Country: United States

Take a look at my brother in laws flickr page.He has 2 lenses and the macro is the one he uses the most.Amazing how versatile it can be when its nearly all you have.
-Jim
http://www.flickr.com/photos/a_pitch/



Aberdeen Photo
Registered: Mar 10, 2006
Total Posts: 2663
Country: United States

It is a great lens, very sharp, relatively quick to focus, for a macro, and very nice blur. I sold mine once I got the 180, however, the 100 is so close in IQ for less than half, that I wonder why I moved up. It always amazes me at how good this lens is and how it can add depth to your images...

Get it is what I think...

Tom



liza
Registered: Jan 31, 2005
Total Posts: 1123
Country: United States

I have one and I use it only for detail shots. It's too slow to be a walkaround lens, IMO.



end