|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
I'm so excited about this (not the frame) I had to post it...it's not weddings, but I'm still really excited about it and this is what I was working on at the time. The reason I posted this is to see what you guys think about the post-processing, because I'm going to apply it to my wedding stuff. I FINALLY figured out the missing ingredient in my photos in PPing (contrast and depth in background). Rip it apart: ![]() ![]() (The second image was taken by my assistant Jammie, but I had fun messing around in Photoshop with it!) I finally figured it out. I've been so frustrated that I haven't been able to have a PP that makes my photos pop, and I finally have it. Again, let me know if I can improve anything. bacilonur, Like the frame? |
|
scott shoemake Registered: Apr 21, 2007 Total Posts: 524 Country: United States |
the first one is nice, the angle actually works well IMO. i'd bump the contrast up a little and add some saturation. |
|
bacilonur Registered: Aug 14, 2006 Total Posts: 860 Country: United States |
I do! Much better. Your second processing shot is excellent. My only nitpick on the first is that he doesn't seem to be looking at the camera, and yet he's facing you. |
|
technocraft Registered: May 14, 2005 Total Posts: 2762 Country: United States |
That's funny. I remember exactly the photos where I figured that out for myself. It was an exciting moment. (this gallery: http://images.tonyschreiber.com/gallery/616910_9Y7pu ) |
|
neridah Registered: Jul 17, 2006 Total Posts: 686 Country: Australia |
Forgive my ignorance but what exactly did you work out apart from adding a little contrast and a little brightness adjustment...Let us in on the secret ? |
|
Scott Clark Registered: Aug 21, 2007 Total Posts: 239 Country: N/A |
neridah wrote: |
|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
I actually didn't mess with the saturation at all |
|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
Tony, |
|
dennisyvette Registered: Mar 07, 2006 Total Posts: 2134 Country: United States |
Cathy, |
|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
Not your fault!!! I've learned so much from being in this forum and my work has really done a 180 since I've been paying attention to the advice in here. I've been doing photography all my life, but I've never been this driven to find a challenge to constantly improve. I love your work...I'm just up the road from you in Catawba County, NC (30 minutes from Gastonia up 321). You're in Greenville, SC, right? |
|
dennisyvette Registered: Mar 07, 2006 Total Posts: 2134 Country: United States |
Cathy Yount wrote: |
|
Tony Brown Registered: Nov 14, 2007 Total Posts: 396 Country: N/A |
i think it would help to see what you were doing before...and see what you are doing now. |
|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
I'll post something tonight if I can remember...I'll post process it globally like I used to. |
|
Cathy Yount Registered: Oct 01, 2007 Total Posts: 479 Country: United States |
We'll have to do a girls visit sometime. Yeah, when we all have time next Jan! |
|
Sam Hassas Registered: Jul 11, 2007 Total Posts: 1467 Country: United States |
Seems to me the focus was on the slate behind the gentleman on the first shot, but then again his shirt and jeans seem in focus. Second shot really shows quite a difference. i like it. Frame works a lot better also. |
|
Todd Baugh Registered: Sep 24, 2006 Total Posts: 177 Country: United States |
I agree, a little more saturation on the first one....and possibly burn (darken) the rocks just a tiny bit. A small amount of vignetting might look good to. All in all, and awesome improvement! |
|
Matt Khoury Registered: Jan 24, 2008 Total Posts: 385 Country: United States |
here's a little NV Outdoor Color pop action on the right side of the photo... Too much?
|