|
Daron Shade Registered: Oct 31, 2004 Total Posts: 378 Country: United States |
c&c invited: ![]() and since the post processing of my recent post drew so much attention, here's a before/after link: http://www.maranaphotography.com/photoshop2/ Thanks for looking, and all feedback greatly appreciated |
|
Robert Kester Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 38 Country: United States |
You've just got to love basic black. Very nice. |
|
Wingspar Registered: Aug 06, 2003 Total Posts: 3719 Country: United States |
Her left arm and legs have too much reddish orange in them, and are very bright in comparison to her face that looks dark and green. Very unbalanced. Also, looking at the before and after, I don’t care for the way you reduced her waist to an unnatural comic strip look, but that’s probably me... Maybe. |
|
FSJ_Guy Registered: Jun 21, 2004 Total Posts: 1737 Country: United States |
A little TOO skinny in the midsection. A good example of where less (adjustment) is more. Skin is a bit contrasty, too. |
|
24Peter Registered: May 04, 2005 Total Posts: 1024 Country: United States |
Nice shot and attractive model. I agree the skin is too saturated/orange-y. Maybe bring down just the red channel in your levels adjustment? How did you light her? |
|
liamh Registered: Jul 24, 2005 Total Posts: 3591 Country: United Kingdom |
Great colors and nice PP but for me, I find the BG a touch distracting; I'd defocus it a little. The hair light's not doing much for me either - it looks like it's there purely because that's where it always is in a 3-point lighting set-up. Also, she's a beautiful model but the pose is not the most inspiring. |
|
jerryrock Registered: May 22, 2006 Total Posts: 1453 Country: United States |
Backlight is set too high giving too much exposure to the legs. Lighting on the face is not strong enough. |
|
Jim Rickards Registered: Dec 02, 2003 Total Posts: 7953 Country: Canada |
The mouseover confirmed my first impression of a over-done waspwaist. Not only too small, but where it is the narrowest has changed (lower) in your shot. |
|
andylaiphoto Registered: May 28, 2005 Total Posts: 2773 Country: United States |
all the attention is on her legs and feet |
|
kinetic Registered: Jan 04, 2006 Total Posts: 512 Country: United States |
the midsection looks bad. I think you may have overdid it a bit. I agree skinnier is good, but that's just artificial looking =( |
|
SJMD Registered: Nov 13, 2004 Total Posts: 15180 Country: United States |
jerryrock wrote: |
|
lylejk Registered: Jun 12, 2004 Total Posts: 3408 Country: United States |
The processing may not be perfect (won't judge on the pose), but I still like what I'm seeing. Thanks for sharing Daron. |
|
horstenj Registered: Apr 02, 2006 Total Posts: 359 Country: Netherlands |
Apart from the comments above on the postprocessing, the composition does not appeal to me. There are so many distractions and elements that lead your eye out of the image that all attention is drawn away from the dress, that according to the title is to be the topic of interest. |
|
kirstin Registered: Oct 06, 2003 Total Posts: 1475 Country: United Kingdom |
a little claustrophobic |