Not a Good Day For Nikon
/forum/topic/612476/0

1
2 3 end

AJ Nadershahi
Registered: Jan 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3420
Country: N/A

http://alittlenews.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/shooting-in-the-deep-freeze-packers-nfc-championship-part-ii/



emreese
Registered: Jul 31, 2006
Total Posts: 543
Country: United States

I wonder how the Canon 1dMkIII did in the same conditions? Or anything else for that matter.



Dadsdesk
Registered: Feb 04, 2005
Total Posts: 381
Country: United States

I'm curious if the journalist moved those D3 bodies from a warm humid locker room to -0F conditions.



andylaiphoto
Registered: May 28, 2005
Total Posts: 2581
Country: United States

I'm fortunate to never have to face those conditions while on the clock.



jmcfadden
Registered: Oct 30, 2002
Total Posts: 28842
Country: United States

stuff happens to us sometimes. This guy was either unlucky or stupid or a bit of both. I have used all my nikons in sub zero conditions and Never had one issue Ever. Minnesota (where i live) is brutal and if this guy was shooting in the locker room which is loaded with humidity warmth etc and then took that same gear straight out into sub zero then yes Anything is possible


J



Zachs
Registered: Jul 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2378
Country: United States

Wow...tough conditions, but what about the people that have taken the D200's to Antarctica and been fine? Obviously they did something wrong if they got a D200 to stop working mid fire...thats really not all that cold considering where other peoples equipment have been... I would def think there is condensation going on inside the body. Don't think even seals will protect against that, right?



Romulus90
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Total Posts: 509
Country: United States

This goes back to that article on luminous landscape a while back where about 10% of canon's failed (1d2 and 1ds2's) in antartica, where as either none or 1 nikon failed.. but there were many more canon's present to begin with.

who knows. It doesn't mean much to me.



Danya Plontz
Registered: Aug 26, 2007
Total Posts: 84
Country: United States

I remember a recent article of an arctic photo blog - guy was shooting emperor penguins with his D300, even had photos of chicks standing around the bottom of his tripod - had zero failures.

Machines fail, usually because of human error or improper care, if we look hard enough we could find many examples of this happening to other brands - its inconsequential to Nikon or any other brand in the grand scheme of things.



Jazno
Registered: Oct 04, 2006
Total Posts: 2395
Country: Canada

Interesting. A couple weeks ago I took my d50 out for about half an hour in -33° (Celsius) -44° with the wind chill. It lasted with no problems at all. The top LCD was a little slow to turn on by the time I was finished, but I didn't notice any other problems. Granted, I only shot about 20 frames, but still.
I'm inclined to agree that there must be something else going on, like condensation issues, as previously mentioned.



musicandlight
Registered: May 10, 2006
Total Posts: 122
Country: United States

Did the shooter bother to check the Operating Temp specified by Nikon before trying to shoot the biggest game of his life?

Nikon specifies 0-40 deg C (32-104 deg F) and he will be working in -25 deg F wind chills -- which is to say WAY outside of spec.

NPS should have warned him as well.



Jammy Straub
Registered: Jan 28, 2007
Total Posts: 3707
Country: United States

I'm surprised any electronics would function for more than 10 or 15 minutes in -25 deg F weather. I am impressed his battery lasted for a quarter in those temperatures.

Interesting, I'd say it was a good day for Nikon. In -25 deg weather their camera captured some amazing images. Granted it took 5 different camera bodies to make it happen...



j.curtis
Registered: May 02, 2004
Total Posts: 6201
Country: United States

Guys, quit quoting -25. You're equipment can't feel the wind chill. It was -4 by the end of the game if I remember correctly.

Granted, the wind may help drive the cold inside the camera.

I bet his main problem was attaching the lens to the body outside. If the body was warm, attach to cold lens, you're going to produce condensation. In a few minutes that condensation is going to freeze! USER ERROR!!!



nathanlake
Registered: May 23, 2005
Total Posts: 5712
Country: United States

This is probably not so much about the camera as the air inside the camera. No camera will continue to operate in those conditions if they a lot of moisture inside. Ice crystals will form on the moving parts and they won't be moving parts any more.

At below zero temps, you need to take some real precautions when moving from a warm (relatively moist inside) to a colder outside. I would pack them in an airtight container well before the exposere and place dessicant with them. That would absorb the moisture and when you went outside, all you have to worry about is the lousy battery life.


And you can forget about complaining to the manufacturer. There is a reason they state 32F on the specs.



jmcfadden
Registered: Oct 30, 2002
Total Posts: 28842
Country: United States

Jammy

i have had my gear out in -20before and i am not talking windchill either , but i take good precautions and always have spare batts inside my jacket and swap when needed



highcontrast
Registered: May 05, 2004
Total Posts: 315
Country: United States

While this is cold and all, it should be noted that photo equipment is not affected by windchill. Windchill is a factor solely for exposed skin due to evaporative cooling. The actual air temperature is all that matters to your camera, since the wind can't cause a camera - as it can exposed skin - to cool to below the actual air temperature.



bias_hjorth
Registered: May 13, 2006
Total Posts: 568
Country: Denmark

Frozen shutter a -4

This is due to an user error, not a camera fault.

"Good Lord makes things better than we humans make things. Here he designs a human body that with proper planning (using the brain he gave us) can survive the most wicked cold temps in the United States. And we humans can’t even design a piece of ($5,000) camera equipment that can last 15-minutes in the same elements."

Since humans have no control over the weather thats no possible.



AJ Nadershahi
Registered: Jan 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3420
Country: N/A

Actually windchill relates to the rate of cooling. It denotes how quickly (for lack of better words), warmth will be sucked away.

The temperature drop is much faster when considering windchill, which would exasperate temperature fluctuations from a camera that was taken from warm to cold and contribute to issues related to condensation.



Outoffilm
Registered: Aug 31, 2005
Total Posts: 215
Country: Canada

There simply HAS to be another factor at work here other than what's being described in the article . I live in Atlantic Canada , where it's freezing cold a LOT of the year . I've NEVER experienced an issue with any Nikon camera and I do quite a bit of shooting in sub zero conditions for hours at a time .
Just last week it was -25C ( before the wind chill factor ) and I was outside with my D300 for hours at a time . Zero camera protection and zero issues . How many footbal games get played in -25C conditions ? Not too many .
Over the years , my D200 and D2Hs has performed flawlessly as well .
So much so that I would NEVER hesitate to out in the cold to shoot .
Now , I do not own a D3 , but to me , the odds of getting 5 or 6 defective cameras
( including a D200 ) in a row are simply too much .
Something else is going on here . It's that simple ( IMO ) .



emreese
Registered: Jul 31, 2006
Total Posts: 543
Country: United States

I have had my D200 out in 15 degree F weather while skiing. Carry the camera around in a Camelback so the camera is totally cold soaked when I pull it out. Works fine. No Problems.



Film_Ruled
Registered: Oct 21, 2005
Total Posts: 633
Country: United States

This has been one of the coldest and snowiest Winters ever in Colorado and my D3 has been flawless, even in -19. I find the battery life to be outstanding it.



Bruce Sawle
Registered: Sep 26, 2006
Total Posts: 1599
Country: United States

emreese wrote:
I wonder how the Canon 1dMkIII did in the same conditions? Or anything else for that matter.



http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=neel/080117



Scott Grant
Registered: Aug 08, 2006
Total Posts: 309
Country: Canada

i have to agree with the above...i'm also from Atlantic Canada and i use my D200 and before that my D70s regularly in -15*C temps taking photos of snowmobiling in barren country. i haven't experienced anything like what was mentioned in that article.








emreese
Registered: Jul 31, 2006
Total Posts: 543
Country: United States

AJ Nadershahi wrote:
Actually windchill relates to the rate of cooling. It denotes how quickly (for lack of better words), warmth will be sucked away.

The temperature drop is much faster when considering windchill, which would exasperate temperature fluctuations from a camera that was taken from warm to cold and contribute to issues related to condensation.


Thought we should get this wind chill thing straightened out.

A camera or any other dry object has nothing to do with wind chill.

The "wind chill factor" is really a measure of the "heat of evaporation". When moisture, specifically on your skin evaporates it cools more rapidly than the surrounding air whether the wind is blowing or not. When the wind blows it speeds up the rate of evaporation which further reduces the temperature of the skin.

Even if the camera was wet, I dont believe it would be affected by the wind since any moisture on the camera would simply freeze. Your skin on the other hand is internally heated so the moisture on your skin does not freeze, just evaporates and makes it feel much colder. Exposed long enough it will freeze, then you would get frostbite!
Ok enough of that.


Edited by emreese on Feb 04, 2008 at 03:32 PM GMT



emreese
Registered: Jul 31, 2006
Total Posts: 543
Country: United States

Hey RONIN2 Nice sled shot!



Outoffilm
Registered: Aug 31, 2005
Total Posts: 215
Country: Canada

I agree on the sled shot !



1
2 3 end