|
TMGraphics Registered: Jul 17, 2004 Total Posts: 1824 Country: United States |
I am looking to buy a handheld digital camera for the times that I can not bring the SLR equipment. In looking at all the models out there I was wondering if any of you have a particular model in mind that produces excellent image quality, low noise and fast shutter response? |
|
TMGraphics Registered: Jul 17, 2004 Total Posts: 1824 Country: United States |
These are the models I have been reading about based only on the megapixel range. |
|
Lotusm50 Registered: Sep 26, 2005 Total Posts: 6050 Country: United States |
None of the digicams are really very good. The Canon Powershot G9 at least gives you a good range of capabilities, including RAW. Here is recent thread over on the Canon forum that compares it favorably to one of the high-ISO benchmarks for the digicam market: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/602247 |
|
htbyron Registered: Apr 12, 2004 Total Posts: 1245 Country: United States |
I use the Panny DMC-LX1 as a carry-anywhere cam for when I don't want to haul a DSLR. It is OK for my purposes -- mostly pocketable form factor, good lens with 28mm FOV in 16:9 mode, raw files, very good manual controls. Noise levels are disappointing, however. The DMC-LX2 tried to address the noise, but at the cost of detail resolution -- more megapixels, but less detail in the end because of the overly aggressive NR. The Leica branded D-LUX 2/3 is apparently identical (although some claim there are differences, the raw files appear to be indistinguishable from what I have read). |
|
Steve Carlton Registered: Sep 21, 2006 Total Posts: 1160 Country: United States |
The Ricoh GX100 is very close in IQ to the GRDs, and you get a 24-72mm zoom. I think the G9 has a nasty shutter lag. The Ricoh has a snap mode. I still think the low noise kings are the Fuji F30/31s, which aren't sold anymore new. The Sigma DP1 could be the ticket when it comes out. |
|
TMGraphics Registered: Jul 17, 2004 Total Posts: 1824 Country: United States |
I just had a look-see at this site http://www.sigma-dp1.com/ for the Sigma. Pretty dam impressive except for a f4.0 lens. Other than that it has a big WOW factor! |
|
henryng Registered: Mar 01, 2004 Total Posts: 928 Country: Canada |
DP1 is not going to be cheap. It doesn't shoot video probably and this is one of the feature I really want from a point and shoot camera. However, if the image quality and the fix focal length lens is great, I am sure a lot of people will buy this little toy. |
|
ytwong Registered: Dec 29, 2003 Total Posts: 837 Country: China |
a vote against LX2 (or panasonic). jpeg is basically useless due to heavy NR and ugly artifacts even in good light (not just resolution lost). RAW of LX2 is not so good either, looks like some kind of NR applied as well and not easy to work with. |
|
TMGraphics Registered: Jul 17, 2004 Total Posts: 1824 Country: United States |
Anyone have any experience with the Ricoh Caplio GX100 and/or the Ricoh GR Digital II?? |
|
Sam N Registered: Dec 16, 2006 Total Posts: 1264 Country: United States |
If you want something small enough that you'll take it with you everywhere, get the SD800IS (or something else in the SD series). |
|
TMGraphics Registered: Jul 17, 2004 Total Posts: 1824 Country: United States |
Anyone have any thoughts or experience on the Ricoh Caplio R7? |
|
nikt Registered: Oct 21, 2005 Total Posts: 5596 Country: Australia |
Ricoh R7. No. |