|
RoadconeTuning Registered: Jan 04, 2008 Total Posts: 2 Country: United States |
i just bought this lens the other day and just started to mess with it really tonight. and i noticed what looks like, what i would call, ghosting of the letters on the lens itself.
|
|
jmcfadden Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 27828 Country: United States |
well more testing is in order then to nail down the issue, not really a whole lot can be determined with this image really. put it on a pod , use a flash to illuminate a target and see if the ghosting is present |
|
RoadconeTuning Registered: Jan 04, 2008 Total Posts: 2 Country: United States |
is what im seeing possibly considered ghosting as its pretty much streaking the letters radially... |
|
jmcfadden Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 27828 Country: United States |
yes but you must take into consideration that you are handholding |
|
Zachs Registered: Jul 08, 2005 Total Posts: 2182 Country: United States |
the 28 2.8 AF is not the best lens in the line up. It is however a good lens when stopped down. The AIS version is much much better. My 28 AF is nothing more than just a good cheap small "just in case" lens. |
|
grmedhat1 Registered: Jan 02, 2005 Total Posts: 2428 Country: Canada |
Welcome to FM. As mentioned do some more testing. As for this shot the ghosting could be your reflection off the glass on the front surface of the mirror. The silvered mirror surface is on the back of the glass thus the double reflection. |
|
R. Francois Registered: Jun 12, 2006 Total Posts: 3307 Country: Netherlands |
i can see the "ghosting" around the nikon letters and your fingers too. make sure it is not motionblur, can you make the same kind of test with the camera on a tripod or something like that? |
|
bellyface Registered: Mar 17, 2003 Total Posts: 4162 Country: United States |
I see a little motion blur... I've never seen any ghosting with my old 28. you should post some more pics to determine the artifact. |
|
Donald Lynd Registered: Feb 20, 2007 Total Posts: 109 Country: United States |
looks like motion blur. |
|
George61d Registered: Dec 07, 2004 Total Posts: 1183 Country: Ireland |
well call me stupid but looking at the dust it seems to me that you have a filter on the front of the lens and that the double image you see in the writing there is nothing more than the reflection off the back of the filter. |
|
Taylor Barrett Registered: Dec 12, 2007 Total Posts: 1432 Country: United States |
Its clearly motion blur. Look at your fingers. You shook the camera... put it on a tripod and see if it "ghosts" |
|
ytwong Registered: Dec 29, 2003 Total Posts: 403 Country: China |
if you look hard at the mirror you can see "ghosting" too, even without camera/lens, go figure |
|
90 5.0 Registered: Jul 08, 2008 Total Posts: 617 Country: United States |
+1 I think it look like motion blur to me as well, the efix is removed so i cannot see what the shutter speed is but since tyou are inside with out any additional lighting i am going to guess it's slow. |
|
molson Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 4644 Country: Canada |
grmedhat1 wrote: |
|
panos.v Registered: Dec 15, 2005 Total Posts: 2456 Country: United Kingdom |
Try another shot of something normal, not reflection of the camera in a mirror. As said it is probably a double reflection off the mirror. |
|
BenV Registered: Jan 01, 2008 Total Posts: 2929 Country: United States |
shooting into a mirror probably isnt the best way to test a lens, it likes to throw off "things" |