Anyone use Canon 200/f1.8?
/forum/topic/586018/0

end

Lord Fluff
Registered: Jun 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2471
Country: United Kingdom

I'm seriously tempted with this lens - seems like an 85L with more reach.

Anyone using this lens for weddings, and if so, would you care to share some images?

Thanks



NikonAndy
Registered: Apr 11, 2006
Total Posts: 1891
Country: United States

I've shot a wedding with the Nikon 200/f2 VR and if the Canon is anything like it, it was the most fantastic lens I've ever used. The Bokeh is simply perfect.



rockit
Registered: Apr 01, 2004
Total Posts: 1963
Country: United States

why not just wait a bit and get the new 200 f2 IS?

new glass, new technology and factory repair support if needed.



Aberdeen Photo
Registered: Mar 10, 2006
Total Posts: 3812
Country: United States

I use it and enjoy it. The images shot w/ it are wonderful. It is a bit bulky,
It focuses very quickly w/ the 5D also.



tutumon
Registered: Jan 03, 2006
Total Posts: 1064
Country: United States

rockit wrote:
why not just wait a bit and get the new 200 f2 IS?

new glass, new technology and factory repair support if needed.


Absolutely...Plus, weddings are not sporting events, so the IS would be more desirable than an additional third of a stop. I'm waiting for the new one to come out too. I saw another photog's images taken with the Nikon 2.0 VR and they were fabulous!

-CHris.



Lord Fluff
Registered: Jun 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2471
Country: United Kingdom

rockit wrote:
why not just wait a bit and get the new 200 f2 IS?

new glass, new technology and factory repair support if needed.



It's a fair point - though looking at it another way - slightly less thin DOF, higher price and optics that are most likely to fall slightly short of the old one. Of course we don't know yet, and as a result the f1.8 prices may plummet when the new lens comes out, or go even higher if the replacement is simply 'great' rather than the best lens Canon ever produced.

Right now I have the option on a tatty one for $2500 and can't decide......



Andrew Welsh
Registered: Jan 20, 2007
Total Posts: 4675
Country: United States

Lord Fluff wrote:
It's a fair point - though looking at it another way - slightly less thin DOF, higher price and optics that are most likely to fall slightly short of the old one. Of course we don't know yet, and as a result the f1.8 prices may plummet when the new lens comes out, or go even higher if the replacement is simply 'great' rather than the best lens Canon ever produced.

Right now I have the option on a tatty one for $2500 and can't decide......


Get the tatty one for $2500. As long as the optics and mechanics are good, a $20 USD (or less) bottle of L lens paint on eBay can help clean up the cosmetic appearance. At that price, it's less than what a new 200/2 IS will cost, and you get it NOW with an opportunity to practice and see if you like it.

I'd jump on that offer if I were you. I'm eyeing this lens myself, for weddings and astrophotography, so I'm interested in how it works out for you for weddings (to help justify the purchase )



sejanus
Registered: Jan 17, 2003
Total Posts: 1057
Country: Australia

I have used it at weddings.

To be honest it is (IMHO) only really usable when you have quite a bit of time at a shoot.

The reason is that at least for me, I have to use it on a monpod, and at f/1.8 the dof is so tiny that you need to be incredibly careful with the focus. It takes time to do this.

The 135/2 is not as long but is a heck of a lot more convenient and faster to use.

That said, the 200/1.8 certainly does deliver when you do use it. Here are a few shots from it.



This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner








Lord Fluff
Registered: Jun 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2471
Country: United Kingdom

Those are really lovely sejanus thanks. I'm guessing you were about 20 feet away for those...I see your point.



asimsoofi
Registered: Apr 26, 2006
Total Posts: 1764
Country: United States

200 1.8... *SIGH* it's on my list.

But my 135L is gorgeous as well and oh so much cheaper. It's a great alternative on a cropped body.
I think I may be in line for the new 200 2.0 IS.

When does the madness end?!?



Lord Fluff
Registered: Jun 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2471
Country: United Kingdom

asimsoofi wrote:

When does the madness end?!?


I'm hoping never....



Mike Mahoney
Registered: Mar 09, 2004
Total Posts: 5175
Country: Canada

I'm finding that many of my faster lenses are being stopped down just to obtain adequate DOF .. even at 1.8 or 2.0 with an 85 you often need to have two people at almost exactly the same distance from the camera to get them both sharp. A 200 would offer less DOF and potentially more focus issues under the same conditions.

I'll regularly toss otherwise great pics because the groom is a half-foot behind the bride and his focus is soft while the brides is razor sharp.

For a few special shots where the conditions are perfect (as sejanus has shown above) you can get awesome shots .. but for everyday wedding work that fast of a lens may prove to be a solution in search of a problem.
Mike



Nick Klofkorn
Registered: Oct 04, 2006
Total Posts: 822
Country: United States

wow sejanus, nice



Mike C.
Registered: Sep 01, 2003
Total Posts: 994
Country: United Kingdom

Lord Fluff,

Be careful as Canon UK have no parts to repair this lens as it has been discontinued since 2004.Make sure the one that you are after is a series 11.

Mike



Lord Fluff
Registered: Jun 08, 2005
Total Posts: 2471
Country: United Kingdom

Mike - really? I'd heard there was a shortage of certain parts but do they really have none in the UK?

When you say "series 11" do you mean 11 or II ?



sboerup
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Total Posts: 8868
Country: United States

I'm itching for the 300 2.8, but I don't know how often I'd use it at the weddings.



end