|
Andrew Krend Registered: Oct 02, 2006 Total Posts: 197 Country: United States |
Hi everyone, ![]() 2) Screen capture of the ZoomBrowser software, looking at one of my test shots. I was about 30 feet away from the targets, which are about 6 to 8 inches away from each other, with the boxes on the side angled slightly and a few inches closer. For me, the boxes on either side are sharper. ![]() 3) Another screen capture. I think this one is pretty damning. The gray line, is a fence about 4 feet behind the boxes. ![]() At this point, I'm going to send both the lens and body in (the lens is still within the first year). However, I'm posting anyhow for a couple of reasons: First, to get some comments from folks who have experienced this type of problem and (hopefully) get some validation about my tests and my conclusions. Please let me know if I'm on the right track with this, or if I should be doing something differently. Second, to show folks how to identify and test for these types of focusing issues (assuming I've done a decent job). These tests didn't take me long to set up, and I found calling canon support (first time) was really painless and the rep I got was very helpful. Andrew Edited by Andrew Krend on Nov 11, 2007 at 08:23 PM GMT |
|
Alistair Watson Registered: Mar 21, 2005 Total Posts: 5848 Country: United Kingdom |
I have only had a quick look at the images but it looks like the camera is front focussing. Send the lenses and body into Canon for calibration. Usually if at least one lens is within warranty then the calibration will be free. |
|
Rijsberman Registered: Mar 06, 2007 Total Posts: 386 Country: Netherlands |
yep, front focus. Have it calibrated, it'll be great then. |
|
Jimbobp Registered: Jul 08, 2003 Total Posts: 1158 Country: United States |
Quick question, are the focus problems with this lens only? |
|
kesava Registered: Sep 19, 2004 Total Posts: 1075 Country: United States |
yes, if you try another lens you shoudl see better focusing. |
|
J.D. Registered: Dec 01, 2003 Total Posts: 2108 Country: Australia |
Agreed: forward focus problem. You can see how much sharper the bubbles are in the first photo. If this is the only lens you have which exhibits this problem then just send the lens away with a copy of these shots so the techs can work it out. |
|
Richard Nye Registered: May 30, 2007 Total Posts: 2171 Country: United States |
Andrew, a test I do to determine the focus point is to photograph your keyboard looking down at about a 30 degree angle. Focus on a particular key (I focus on the little button cursor thingy on my Thinkpad laptop). You can quickly tell if it's front or back focusing. Although yours looks like it's front focusing. BTW, my 70-200 f/4 IS is scary sharp! |
|
Xavier Rival Registered: Jul 21, 2004 Total Posts: 3885 Country: France |
Yes, it is bad. Are your other lenses fine or do they present some kind of focusing issue too ? |
|
Andrew Krend Registered: Oct 02, 2006 Total Posts: 197 Country: United States |
Hi all, ![]() Since the light was different than yesterday and I wanted to sanity check myself, I also took about 30 more shots with the 70-200. I found fewer shots (than the other day) which had focusing issues, however, it still happened in around 1 out of 5 shots. I also noticed one particularly bad one, which seemed like what I saw with the 28-135 above. 5) Again with the 70-200, but this time it's not so much front focused and focused everywhere but where the center point is.. ![]() A few replies have mentioned how sharp this lens is. I agree completely. In fact, that may have something to do with how I "got by" with it for nearly a year. Shots from within 20 or 30 feet seemed (at least until that bird outing on friday) to be okay most of the time. But perhaps the focus has been slightly off the whole time and the lens is so dang sharp I just haven't been bothered by it. I did do a bit of postprocessing on this image.. but I'd call it razor sharp (it's a bit large): Sharp Owl Now I'm a bit more confused than when I started, but both camera and lens are going in on Monday either way. If needed, I'll pay Canon a bit for some sanity. Andrew |
|
Xavier Rival Registered: Jul 21, 2004 Total Posts: 3885 Country: France |
I was worried about that when seeing your previous tests, but now it seems even more likely: and what if the AF system was not properly aligned in the camera ? I am not sure whetehr it is plausible, but I think it would explain the results. |
|
simon_says Registered: May 22, 2006 Total Posts: 812 Country: Canada |
Note that the focus points are far larger than the boxes shown in the viewfinder. They probably overlap with the boxes in your posted shots. The AF points tend to usually pick up the object of greatest contrast. Use a proper chart, etc. to test it. |
|
therock Registered: Jan 26, 2006 Total Posts: 1712 Country: United States |
I agree with simon_says. |
|
Willamette Registered: Aug 18, 2005 Total Posts: 289 Country: United States |
Focus points are not confined to the little box, they do extend beyond. I would put the camera into AI Servo, then place the focus point on the box and hold the shutter half way, then move the focus point left or right and see when the focus falls off the box and into the background subject. In some of your pictures it could still be touching one of the two boxes. On my 10D it would definitely touch, however the 20D has a better focus system and may, or may not, extend as far beyond the squares. That is the center point on the 20D and could be a cross type sensor that may not be as effective with an f4 lens (usually f2.8 or faster). One of the left or right points may be more accurate on a vertical subject being that those focus points are vertical bars rather than horizontal like the upper points. Once you are sure where the fall-off point is then position your subjects with enough distance apart to test. |
|
Susan_S Registered: Jan 24, 2005 Total Posts: 118 Country: Australia |
It is quite possible to have a 70-200 that focuses reasonably well close up, but the further away you go the more the focus misses... My non-IS f4 did that, (although in my case it was backfocus at long distances) and because bench top tests close up looked fine, it was a beast to diagnose. It's hard to set up decent targets 50-100 feet away, and test unambiguously, because of the issue of the rather larger than you think focus sensors covering more objects at longer distances. |
|
Andrew Krend Registered: Oct 02, 2006 Total Posts: 197 Country: United States |
|
|
Ariel Bravy Registered: Dec 28, 2004 Total Posts: 7357 Country: United States |
It looks as if the camera's AF point is over the fence, yet the boxes are in focus. A fun test would be to move the boxes out of the way and see if the camera still frontfocuses the same amount. Then move the boxes forward or backward and see if the distance the camera frontfocuses changes. |