17-40 come with a lens hood?
/forum/topic/573738/0

end

WorldBuilder
Registered: Sep 25, 2004
Total Posts: 8167
Country: United States

Hi all,

Silly question, methinks. I am looking at buying a Canon EF 17-40mm F/4 L USM from BuyDig. It's the full USA retail package, but the website does not inform me as to whether or not the retail package includes the lens hood.

Does it? I'm sure someone here knows. :-)

Thanks!

Chris



Jammy Straub
Registered: Jan 28, 2007
Total Posts: 6612
Country: United States

Yep, all L lenses do.



WorldBuilder
Registered: Sep 25, 2004
Total Posts: 8167
Country: United States

Thanks, Jammy



StuCollings
Registered: Jan 07, 2005
Total Posts: 246
Country: United Kingdom

And a nice soft lens case! Why don't Canon wake up and give a hood with ALL their lenses?



pixelman
Registered: Mar 16, 2002
Total Posts: 1388
Country: Canada

Because it costs them money. Profits matter. Juicy higher cost items get spiffs, tighter lower end cheapskate don't get all the bells and whistles, kind of just like my pricing. Their stock is doing rather nicely. Steve



aero145
Registered: Jul 01, 2006
Total Posts: 333
Country: Germany

Comes with the EW-83E hood... I couldn't care less if there comes hood or not, I don't use it.



Roy Pertchik
Registered: Dec 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3341
Country: United States

17-40 fixed hood is a joke. It's just so wide it does almost nothing unless the sun happens to be in just the right spot on the sides. If you are using a 1.6 crop camera, the hood designed for a 24mm L is better on the 17-40 than the one designed for the 17-40, but only a little better. Quite a bit better is a rubber collapsible hood, but you have to remember to "trombone" the hood to keep it compatible with your zoom length. With my 17-40 on my 20D, I use the hood from my 24L. On my 5D, I don't bother with a hood near 17, it's pretty pointless, and I'll hold my hat in the right spot to block the sun, if necessary.



Liscia
Registered: Dec 13, 2004
Total Posts: 1470
Country: United States

All Roy says is good and true. The EW-83E hood with is huge and
will be almost useless on OP's 1.6 cf XTi. Rubber Hoya Multihood is
my route and it's a good consolation to know that the 17-40L isn't as
prone to flare as are many other zoom lenses.



Roy Pertchik
Registered: Dec 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3341
Country: United States

Yes, the 17-40 ROCKS! (I handle low light with a 24L. I could trade both for a 16-25 MkII, but I think I'm ahead the way I have it, for both IQ and lowest light.)



Fred Relaix
Registered: Jan 09, 2007
Total Posts: 1007
Country: France

On a crop camera, the best hood for the 17-40L is the EW-83J designed for the EF-S 17-55/2.8IS. It fits perfectly and you can get pretty cheap clones on ebay.



Emile Gregoire
Registered: Sep 09, 2004
Total Posts: 2361
Country: Belgium

Liscia wrote:
All Roy says is good and true. The EW-83E hood with is huge and
will be almost useless on OP's 1.6 cf XTi. Rubber Hoya Multihood is
my route and it's a good consolation to know that the 17-40L isn't as
prone to flare as are many other zoom lenses.


Could be, but he forgets to mention that a lot of people use a hood to protect their lens as well. I'd rather have my lens bump into a wall with hood attached than not. Saved me quite a few bucks, looking at the state of some of my hoods and that includes the one that comes with the 17-40.



Liscia
Registered: Dec 13, 2004
Total Posts: 1470
Country: United States

Did forget to detail that Emile but thought it was covered by 'almost useless' ?



Roy Pertchik
Registered: Dec 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3341
Country: United States

Emile Gregoire wrote:
... a lot of people use a hood to protect their lens as well.....


(All my gear is covered under a rider on my home renters insurance... Never filed a claim, and if I ever do, I guess my rate would jump, but I am covered for any kind of damage or loss.... Some people still swear by a hood for protection. For me, I go filter-less and unless there is a reason expect harsh environs, I often go hood-less too. Whehooo... living in the fast lane! :



Edited by Roy Pertchik on Sep 23, 2007 at 09:02 AM GMT



Emile Gregoire
Registered: Sep 09, 2004
Total Posts: 2361
Country: Belgium

Liscia wrote:
Did forget to detail that Emile but thought it was covered by 'almost useless' ?


Yep, you got me there...



snurresprett
Registered: Jan 21, 2006
Total Posts: 711
Country: Norway

The normal fix for the ridiculous 17-40 hood on a crop camera is to substitute a 24mm hood such as the EW-83D. I've actually modified this hood for use on a 5D, it was a few minutes' work with a Dremel and makes a far more practical package.

Pics at http://www.pbase.com/ssanneru/alternative_1740_lenshood



Matt Philbin
Registered: Jul 17, 2007
Total Posts: 2095
Country: United States

Don't try to use a pop up flash with the stock hood on, either. It casts huge shadows on some subjects.



Roy Pertchik
Registered: Dec 05, 2004
Total Posts: 3341
Country: United States

snurresprett wrote:
The normal fix for the ridiculous 17-40 hood on a crop camera is to substitute a 24mm hood such as the EW-83D. I've actually modified this hood for use on a 5D, it was a few minutes' work with a Dremel and makes a far more practical package.

Pics at http://www.pbase.com/ssanneru/alternative_1740_lenshood


Great link to a great page on you hood mod, Snurresprett!



Will Kamin
Registered: Dec 26, 2006
Total Posts: 246
Country: United States

Interesting mod. Is that worth doing for a 1D?



Don Price
Registered: May 03, 2004
Total Posts: 428
Country: United States

Put the EW83E on your 10-22 lens and buy the correct one for the 17-40..I think it's the 24mm hood..then they all work fine !!
Don



Kier
Registered: Aug 17, 2005
Total Posts: 99
Country: United Kingdom

Spend a little extra and buy the EW-83J, which is the hood for the EF-S 17-55mm. It does not vignette on 1.3 or 1.6 bodies and does a MUCH better job than the EW-83E

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner



snurresprett
Registered: Jan 21, 2006
Total Posts: 711
Country: Norway

Will Kamin wrote:
Interesting mod. Is that worth doing for a 1D?


No, simply because the hood does not vignette on a 1.3 crop! It _barely_ vignettes on a 5D, hence the mod.



end