|
WorldBuilder Registered: Sep 25, 2004 Total Posts: 8167 Country: United States |
Hi all, |
|
Jammy Straub Registered: Jan 28, 2007 Total Posts: 6612 Country: United States |
Yep, all L lenses do. |
|
WorldBuilder Registered: Sep 25, 2004 Total Posts: 8167 Country: United States |
Thanks, Jammy |
|
StuCollings Registered: Jan 07, 2005 Total Posts: 246 Country: United Kingdom |
And a nice soft lens case! Why don't Canon wake up and give a hood with ALL their lenses? |
|
pixelman Registered: Mar 16, 2002 Total Posts: 1388 Country: Canada |
Because it costs them money. Profits matter. Juicy higher cost items get spiffs, tighter lower end cheapskate don't get all the bells and whistles, kind of just like my pricing. Their stock is doing rather nicely. Steve |
|
aero145 Registered: Jul 01, 2006 Total Posts: 333 Country: Germany |
Comes with the EW-83E hood... I couldn't care less if there comes hood or not, I don't use it. |
|
Roy Pertchik Registered: Dec 05, 2004 Total Posts: 3341 Country: United States |
17-40 fixed hood is a joke. It's just so wide it does almost nothing unless the sun happens to be in just the right spot on the sides. If you are using a 1.6 crop camera, the hood designed for a 24mm L is better on the 17-40 than the one designed for the 17-40, but only a little better. Quite a bit better is a rubber collapsible hood, but you have to remember to "trombone" the hood to keep it compatible with your zoom length. With my 17-40 on my 20D, I use the hood from my 24L. On my 5D, I don't bother with a hood near 17, it's pretty pointless, and I'll hold my hat in the right spot to block the sun, if necessary. |
|
Liscia Registered: Dec 13, 2004 Total Posts: 1470 Country: United States |
All Roy says is good and true. The EW-83E hood with is huge and |
|
Roy Pertchik Registered: Dec 05, 2004 Total Posts: 3341 Country: United States |
Yes, the 17-40 ROCKS! (I handle low light with a 24L. I could trade both for a 16-25 MkII, but I think I'm ahead the way I have it, for both IQ and lowest light.) |
|
Fred Relaix Registered: Jan 09, 2007 Total Posts: 1007 Country: France |
On a crop camera, the best hood for the 17-40L is the EW-83J designed for the EF-S 17-55/2.8IS. It fits perfectly and you can get pretty cheap clones on ebay. |
|
Emile Gregoire Registered: Sep 09, 2004 Total Posts: 2361 Country: Belgium |
Liscia wrote: |
|
Liscia Registered: Dec 13, 2004 Total Posts: 1470 Country: United States |
Did forget to detail that Emile but thought it was covered by 'almost useless' ? |
|
Roy Pertchik Registered: Dec 05, 2004 Total Posts: 3341 Country: United States |
Emile Gregoire wrote: |
|
Emile Gregoire Registered: Sep 09, 2004 Total Posts: 2361 Country: Belgium |
Liscia wrote: |
|
snurresprett Registered: Jan 21, 2006 Total Posts: 711 Country: Norway |
The normal fix for the ridiculous 17-40 hood on a crop camera is to substitute a 24mm hood such as the EW-83D. I've actually modified this hood for use on a 5D, it was a few minutes' work with a Dremel and makes a far more practical package. |
|
Matt Philbin Registered: Jul 17, 2007 Total Posts: 2095 Country: United States |
Don't try to use a pop up flash with the stock hood on, either. It casts huge shadows on some subjects. |
|
Roy Pertchik Registered: Dec 05, 2004 Total Posts: 3341 Country: United States |
snurresprett wrote: |
|
Will Kamin Registered: Dec 26, 2006 Total Posts: 246 Country: United States |
Interesting mod. Is that worth doing for a 1D? |
|
Don Price Registered: May 03, 2004 Total Posts: 428 Country: United States |
Put the EW83E on your 10-22 lens and buy the correct one for the 17-40..I think it's the 24mm hood..then they all work fine !! |
|
Kier Registered: Aug 17, 2005 Total Posts: 99 Country: United Kingdom |
Spend a little extra and buy the EW-83J, which is the hood for the EF-S 17-55mm. It does not vignette on 1.3 or 1.6 bodies and does a MUCH better job than the EW-83E |