|
Donald Lynd Registered: Feb 20, 2007 Total Posts: 109 Country: United States |
The studio I work with A LOT (freelance) was not at all thrilled when they saw my iso 400, 500 and 800 from an event I shot the other night for them. The studio is Canon, currently 1Ds M2. So noise is not an issue. |
|
EltonTeng Registered: Mar 21, 2005 Total Posts: 1868 Country: United States |
I guess ultimately, the question comes down to how much you're looking to spend to determine if the D3 is an option. What kind of studio is this? What do they commission you to shoot? Where do they send you for your gigs? |
|
Steve Spencer Registered: Nov 08, 2006 Total Posts: 3886 Country: Canada |
Hi Donald, |
|
jmcfadden Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 27828 Country: United States |
You could just go get Noiseware and be amazed at what one more step in the workflow could do for you. I really have a hard time believing an ISO400 file would be unacceptable to anyone from a D200. But since you say you do a lot of work for them , i susepct it is one of just familiarity on their part in processing the Canon files. I know that when i do work for others with Canon cameras the workflow is different than my norm and i just roll with it and know that they would feel the same thing doing work on my files |
|
Tim Purcell Registered: Aug 06, 2005 Total Posts: 468 Country: United States |
Donald Lynd wrote: |
|
caleb condit Registered: Nov 20, 2006 Total Posts: 859 Country: United States |
If you work frequently with them, I'd look into the 5d for sure. I'd go with a 24-70 f2.8 over the 24-105 f4 but that's because I like shooting with available light and prefer higher quality lenses. I find anything out of the range of the 24-70, even for events, not much needed for my shooting style. I think you'll love the files out of a 5d coming from a d200 when working above iso 400 and the viewfinder is a bit nicer. |