|
gerov Registered: Nov 29, 2004 Total Posts: 7097 Country: United States |
I remember about 18 months back, Guy's thread on the DMR was reaching epic proportions and there was much discussion on the quality of both the DMR images and the Leica glass. There were also some issues relating to focus accuracy and focusing screen adjustments, etc. Haven't seen a DMR thread in a long time, and I was wondering if those of you who purchased one are still using it and as enthusiastic now as you were then. |
|
dcmiller Registered: May 21, 2002 Total Posts: 3427 Country: United States |
Hey, I have a blue merle Australian shepard. Is that what I see in your photo? |
|
gerov Registered: Nov 29, 2004 Total Posts: 7097 Country: United States |
dcmiller wrote: |
|
dcmiller Registered: May 21, 2002 Total Posts: 3427 Country: United States |
Mine dog looks a lot like yours. |
|
kevin2i Registered: Apr 11, 2006 Total Posts: 133 Country: United States |
Looks like the M8 is stealing the show . . . |
|
telyt Registered: Mar 01, 2004 Total Posts: 631 Country: United States |
I'm still using the DMR, still delighted with the image quality, still wishing the R8 had an SL viewfinder ![]() |
|
foto-z Registered: Jul 14, 2005 Total Posts: 3309 Country: United Kingdom |
I believe Guy deleted the DMR thread. |
|
pdmphoto Registered: Jan 02, 2005 Total Posts: 2297 Country: United States |
Yes, he did. And then he left this forum. He now resides on the Leica Camera Forum where he seems more like a Leica rep than his old self |
|
EricH Registered: Jan 11, 2002 Total Posts: 327 Country: United States |
I still shoot with mine and really enjoy it. I am always impressed when i make prints. They look so real. |
|
photoArne Registered: Nov 28, 2005 Total Posts: 875 Country: Norway |
I still have it and use it, but perhaps not so much as before, mainly because it has got competition from a charming new toy, the M8 |
|
photoArne Registered: Nov 28, 2005 Total Posts: 875 Country: Norway |
First was with the 180 mm Apo 2,8. |
|
Conner999 Registered: Jan 22, 2006 Total Posts: 2786 Country: Canada |
It was a great concept that could have done well with some better refinement, follow-thru and maybe a better 'partner' (e.g. Iamcon vs. say Kodak). Upgradable backs, FF or APS sensor choices, B&W only (no bayer filter) for better sharpness sensor, etc etc. |
|
Lotusm50 Registered: Sep 26, 2005 Total Posts: 4208 Country: United States |
I suppose, also, that since the DMR was discontinued, everyone is just waiting to see what Leica is going to replace it with. There are rumours floating around of an R10. |
|
photoArne Registered: Nov 28, 2005 Total Posts: 875 Country: Norway |
One reason there are few DMR threads is the low number of new users after it was discontinued some months ago. Present owners have mostly sorted out their initial problems I guess. |
|
woodyspedden Registered: Nov 24, 2005 Total Posts: 897 Country: United States |
I still have mine and still love it! The files are very similar to the M8 which I also have. I have no issues any longer with the DMR and find it a joy to use. I can't imagine using the M8 for macro or longer telephoto so having a DSLR in the stable is a must and the DMR is the best DSLR I know of. And of course the R glass. |
|
cdnguyen Registered: Mar 19, 2003 Total Posts: 873 Country: United States |
I'm keeping all my R lenses with an R8 waiting for the new R10. DMR used still hold value well. Been shooting with my M8 and Pan L1. The R lenses are still superb to me. |
|
brainiac Registered: Nov 22, 2005 Total Posts: 6576 Country: United Kingdom |
Why was it discontinued? |
|
brainiac Registered: Nov 22, 2005 Total Posts: 6576 Country: United Kingdom |
> Yes, he did. And then he left this forum. He now resides on the Leica Camera Forum where he seems more like a Leica rep than his old self |
|
jjlphoto Registered: Jan 03, 2005 Total Posts: 7112 Country: United States |
Leica announced the DMR project dead quite a long time ago. |
|
carstenw Registered: Dec 26, 2005 Total Posts: 2996 Country: Germany |
Yep, I have a good chunk of it saved as a PDF, but it was only about 8 months or so, ie. about half the thread. However, it is the first half, which was arguably the more valuable half, although many of the photos are missing due to some accident on the FM server. I offered once to put it somewhere on a website, but it is 372.3MB, so the only way I will pass it on to anyone is if they will put it up on a website. Hubsand offered once, but I lost contact with him before sending it. |
|
brainiac Registered: Nov 22, 2005 Total Posts: 6576 Country: United Kingdom |
Hmmm. I could, but I am not keen to serve that quantity of data from my server. I wonder if FM could be persuaded to host it... |
|
photoArne Registered: Nov 28, 2005 Total Posts: 875 Country: Norway |
I have it downloaded as PDF, 507 pages from the start until Jan.30-2006. Most early photos missing. Some 110 mb. |
|
carstenw Registered: Dec 26, 2005 Total Posts: 2996 Country: Germany |
Mine goes 1309 pages from start to March 16, 2006 |
|
gerov Registered: Nov 29, 2004 Total Posts: 7097 Country: United States |
Thanks to all who have responded - I don't actually own an R9-DMR, but followed the thread and discussions with great interest because they actually went beyond the camera itself and into the processing, the lenses and the real essence of photography. I followed it every day, and was somewhat disappointed the day it disappeared. |