|
IFeito Registered: Jan 12, 2006 Total Posts: 124 Country: Mexico |
One of the oldest Canon dealers in Mexico City hosted a Canon Day yesterday, I had a chance to spend quite a bit of time with a Technical guy and he indicated that -even though he couldn't confirm anything- the 1Ds Mk III was scheduled for an October 1st release and the prototype with the best chance of making it to production had a 22 MP sensor. He was not a sales rep, so I think there's a good chance he could be right. |
|
John--G Registered: May 28, 2003 Total Posts: 1633 Country: United States |
IFeito wrote: |
|
Eyeball Registered: Jan 11, 2005 Total Posts: 957 Country: Mexico |
Which dealer was it, Ignacio, if you don't mind my asking? I live in Mexico City and am always on the look-out for an upper-end camera store/dealer. |
|
Alan321 Registered: Nov 07, 2005 Total Posts: 5749 Country: Australia |
video lenses don't need the same resolution as still camera lenses and are probably not worth using on a still camera even if you could attach one. Also, the sensor on the video camera is smaller than the still camera sensor and so the lens image circle would be too small for the dSLR. |
|
kin.vhw Registered: Jul 29, 2006 Total Posts: 107 Country: Mexico |
Eyeball wrote: |
|
cad3 Registered: Apr 12, 2006 Total Posts: 607 Country: United States |
Sweet... Oct 1 release. |
|
jamesf99 Registered: Oct 09, 2004 Total Posts: 4203 Country: United States |
IFeito wrote: |
|
jmraso Registered: May 26, 2004 Total Posts: 1293 Country: Spain |
So by the time they release the 22MB mark III and we (hopefully) acquire a copy there will be a rumor for a 30MB Mark III N or Mark IV which will make us wish it and "depreciate" our present 22MB beast which we are already wishing !!! |
|
EOS20 Registered: Mar 06, 2005 Total Posts: 11417 Country: Australia |
From what I recall, the Canon XL-2 video camera has a 7x crop on 35mm lenses, so having a 7-XXmm lens isn't unusual. Same as digital P&S lenses. |
|
Malcolm Nickol Registered: Jun 01, 2007 Total Posts: 1 Country: United Kingdom |
The 22MP 1Ds Mark iii makes a lot of sense if you consider the 1D. The 1D3 has a sensor with 1.25 times the number of pixels as the 1D2 but by reducing the spacing, and the gap between photosites, Canon has managed to keep the size of individual photosites the same. Multiply the 17MP of the 1Ds2 by 1.25 and you have just about 22MP. The trick of keeping the same size photosite suggests that there will be no increase in noise. |
|
hexentanz Registered: Apr 11, 2005 Total Posts: 606 Country: Germany |
But. but omg. Canon will never do this, it will take away sales from the 1dsmkII!! |