EF300 f2.8 non IS?
/forum/topic/533194/0

end

CountryBob
Registered: Oct 04, 2006
Total Posts: 221
Country: Australia

I have been looking for a second hand 300 f2.8 IS but without much luck. However I came accross a non IS model which is in superb condition, but I feel its a bit pricey and old with the date code being "UI 0620" (1994?).
I brought home a few test shots and found them to be good, however I don't know much about this non IS model and would like to ask if there is anyone out there that would like to comment on it.

Thanks.



redal
Registered: May 25, 2005
Total Posts: 965
Country: New Zealand

Bob,
down here we don't get any 300 2.8 IS second hand , i guess the same in Aussie , market is to small , so they are usually sold by word of mouth.
That one you are looking at isn't old , i picked one up a few weeks ago and it UF thats 91.
I had a sigma 120-300 which i thought was good , and brought the 300f2.8 and was happy with it , not thrilled just happy , i had it for a couple of weeks .
I was sending my 70-200 with my 1D to be calibrated and matched so i sent my 300 in aswell , and now i'm very happy .
They are expensive , but much cheaper than a new IS model . Have a look in the buy sell at FM and the ones selling in the States aren't that much cheaper, maybe a little seeing the guts has fallen out of there dollar.



bbudman
Registered: Dec 22, 2005
Total Posts: 560
Country: United States

Bob, I spend months looking for a used EF300 f/2.8IS but every one I found was sold almost as fast as it was posted and for not much less than the cost of a new one. I finally broke down and bought a new one from B&H and could not be happier. If you happen upon a used one then I say jump on it but if you can't go ahead and buy a new one because it is surely one lens you won't be selling anytime soon!



MikeBinOKlahom
Registered: Sep 16, 2003
Total Posts: 653
Country: United States

I bought a used non-IS 300/2.8 and was happy with it for about a year before replacing it with the IS version. IS version is sharper, focuses closer, and is lighter! The IS version is an amazing lens, I encourage you to gut it out and get the IS version rather than settling for less.



spdntrxi
Registered: Oct 06, 2006
Total Posts: 129
Country: United States

as great as the IS ...is the non-IS is also steller and can be had for approx ~1500 or so less $$$$ , one thing to consider is that is no longer serviced by canon directly.



redal
Registered: May 25, 2005
Total Posts: 965
Country: New Zealand

Regarding the service of the 300f2.8 non IS , im not sure about in Aussie , across the ditch they still are .



CountryBob
Registered: Oct 04, 2006
Total Posts: 221
Country: Australia

Allan Buddy Mike spdntrxi

Thanks for taking the time to reply! I pointed out the age of the lens to the people in the camera shop but they were not interested. Even though it is in superb condition and the shots I took were good, I feel it is well over priced and for about another US$800 I can get a new IS model from a very reputable grey market dealer with the Canon warranty still valid. Or for a further US$800 I can get the IS from a Canon dealer. I guess I'll just have to save up my pennies for the next couple of months!

Thanks again!
Bob



Danny Calhoun
Registered: Jul 07, 2005
Total Posts: 79
Country: United States

Bob,

I would like to point out that if you can sell a relatively good used lens for the price of a brand new lens, then the net cost to you is almost 0$. This is the easiest way to rent a high quality lens from Canon for alomost nothing in costs.

Dan



gasrocks
Registered: May 23, 2005
Total Posts: 890
Country: United States

I have had many great lenses that I sold for more or almost as much as I paid for them, after using them for a year or two. Very cheap "rental."



end