|
pdmphoto Registered: Jan 02, 2005 Total Posts: 2438 Country: United States |
I had one of these over a year ago when I was hot on Zuiko's. At that time I also had the Zuiko 100/2 and found it to be sharper across the frame, and with less CA. I also wasn't too impressed with it's macro performance. Since that time I've tried many other macro lenses (which performed better), and even sold the 100/2 because I could justify carrying that lens around with a 90-100mm macro. Well I've gone full circle and made my way back to the Zuiko 90/2, kind of by accident. ![]() 100% crop: ![]() One wide open at normal distances: ![]() |
|
mcbroomf Registered: Mar 18, 2003 Total Posts: 1152 Country: United States |
Well, all I can say is that you have a disgustingly neat looking lawn |
|
handcoater Registered: Apr 01, 2005 Total Posts: 953 Country: United States |
I have tried almost everything and the one lens that still stands out in my mind is the Olympus 90mm f:2 macro. It easily matched the Leica 100mm 2.8 APO macro I compared it to on my 1DsII, and was smaller, lighter, and cheaper to boot. If there is any criticism I conld make against this lens it is that it is very contrasty, frequently more than the Canon was capable of. It was very sharp, even wide open, had no CA and wonderful color. In brighter light the contrast could cause problems, otherwise it is one of the most perfect lenses I can think of. |
|
Cinstance Registered: Oct 09, 2003 Total Posts: 3733 Country: United States |
The Zuiko 90/2 and 50/2 macros top my Zuiko recommendation list. The two lenses are very similar despite the focal length difference. |