|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Just curiuos if anyone can shed some light on an issue I have seen crop up a few times with my 5D when using a Contax/Yashica Focus confirmation adapter I bought from happypagehk off the auction site. On at least three to four recent occasions when using this adapter with both a C/Y Zeiss 28 2.8 AND the C/Y Zeiss 35-70 Zoom, the camera shutter seems to stay open way too long resulting in an extremely overexposed frame. My first thought was that somehow I might be seeing a mirror problem with the 5D and these lenses on this particular adapter but then why would that affect the shutter? Switching to a different adapter - the Fotodiox Pro - the problem seems to go away. I do recall that I was focusing near infinity which also gives some credence to a possible mirror issue(If for instance, that particular adapter allowed me to focus just barely past infinity and that was just enough to cause a mirror issue?). OR, is there any way that the focus confirmation chip could somehow electronically cause an issue with exposure?(which seems unlikely) Has anyone else seen this sort of behavior? |
|
httivals Registered: May 08, 2004 Total Posts: 769 Country: United States |
I haven't seen it. It sounds like you have mirror interference. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
The funny thing is that the few times I have encountered mirror interference with other lenses, the opposite occurs. The frame is severly underexposed, not overexposed. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Some more testing and it is indeed a mirror issue. Apparently, the tolerances are so close with the C/Y Zeiss lenses when used with an adapter on a 5D that if the adapter just barely goes past infinity, there is mirror interference. So, the solution is to either be extrremely careful not to focus past infinity OR use an adapter which does not allow this. I guess the cheaper adapter used with the confirmation chip is made a little extra thin which is why I ran into this issue. Thank goodness the rear elements are recessed so that they were not scratched on these two lenses. They are both MM type lenses and I don't know if that affects this or not as it is actually the housing which holds the rear elements which causes the interference. They also work perfectly with no interference as long as infinity focus is not ever so slightly missed. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
One last observation. The happypagehk confiramtion adapter will not work at all with the C/Y Zeiss 35-70mm MM regardless of the focusing distance! That adapter seems to always cause mirror interference with this particular lens and body and it has nothing to do with the distance of the rear element but rather the distance that adapter places the stationary inner barrel from the mirror which is where the interference issue is. No problem at all with that same lens using the Fotodiox Pro adapter on the same body(5D). |
|
pdmphoto Registered: Jan 02, 2005 Total Posts: 2434 Country: United States |
Happypage states that his newest Contax-EOS adapters are thinner than his previous adapters, and what many others sell. That's because many wide angle users have reported to him that a thinner adapter is needed for best performance (and proper regestration film to flange). If you use the Fotodiox Pro adapter on one of the wides you may find it's too thick and/or givesd poor perfomance across the frame. Adapters for the Contax CZ's seem to be a real pain. It's best to match each lens to a specific adapter an leave it there. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Yep. I did buy my happypage adapter recently and it was one of the newer, thinner ones I guess. The various C/Y lenses do appear to be very picky as far as adapters go. Wish I had a Zeiss 21mm to test your theory. |
|
lars-rd Registered: Oct 25, 2004 Total Posts: 9 Country: Germany |
Hi Tariq, |
|
kevin2i Registered: Apr 11, 2006 Total Posts: 133 Country: United States |
If the mirror is sticking, it is the removable block at the top of the lens mount (on the lens). My 35-70 was causing the mirror to stick . . . which was confusing because the glass is deep in the mount. After removing the block (can be filed and re-installed) no more problem. ![]() |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Thanks Lars and Kevin. Very helpful information. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Kevin, again, thank you, thank you, thank you. I removed the block you mentioned and the Happypage focus confirmation adapter works perfectly now with my 35-70 lens. What a great combination. I can't imagine using that lens without the "beep" for focus confirmation that adapter allows. What a great lens. |
|
Kit Laughlin Registered: Mar 08, 2004 Total Posts: 2164 Country: Australia |
Damn—wish I had read this thread six months ago—my 35-70 hung on my 5D's mirror too, and I sold it. It is a great lens for the money, for sure. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Kit, these lenses are selling for even less than they did 6 months ago. Mine was a MM mint condition for just under $300. I bet you would have no problem getting one for between $250-$300 right now. |
|
rfkiii Registered: Dec 25, 2005 Total Posts: 223 Country: United States |
Tariq Gibran wrote: |
|
John Black Registered: Jul 15, 2004 Total Posts: 3492 Country: United States |
I know the Tariq's post is in reference to the 5D, but here's some additional experience with HappyPage's latest revision. So far they work very well on the 1Ds2 and I've not had any clearance issues with the newer (thinner) adapters. Infinity focus appears good too. I've used the 28/2 and 100/2; I'll try the 35-135 later this weekend. HappyPage has been excellent to deal with - he even zapped the AF chip with the appropriate lens information for each of my lenses. It took a bit longer to get adapters due to this customization, but now the EXIF shows the correct mm for each. |
|
PSquared63 Registered: Oct 25, 2004 Total Posts: 1644 Country: United States |
John Black wrote: |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
rfkiii wrote: |