|
rprouty Registered: Aug 10, 2002 Total Posts: 4807 Country: United States |
On Sunday I photographed a group of about 70 people in front of their church. They wanted a 13X19 to hang inside. I printed it on an Epson 2200 on Premimum Luster paper. they think the print is great. I think it is acceptable but not great. It was shot with a D60 and 24-70 Canon lens. Question, would it have been lots better with a 1Ds and lots more pixels? I would like to be able to justify a 1Ds to the wife so help me out folks. |
|
chris78cpr Registered: Aug 27, 2003 Total Posts: 5279 Country: United Kingdom |
Yes. |
|
bouch Registered: Jun 07, 2003 Total Posts: 1731 Country: United States |
I agree with Chris. In my experience 13x19's are quite a bit better with the 1Ds than the 10D, especially for large group shots or landscapes where you want to see a lot of fine details. |
|
Ben Horne Registered: Jan 10, 2002 Total Posts: 9287 Country: United States |
This is where the 1Ds shines. The D60 is a fine camera, but it just doen't have enough resolution to render enough detail on each photo in an enlarged group photo. |
|
daveperk Registered: Jul 07, 2003 Total Posts: 1471 Country: United States |
10D prints are roughly 7x10" at 300 pixels per inch (usually regarded as optimum print resolution setting) and 1Ds prints are more like 10x14".. which means one need not do a heck of a lot of "enlarging" (either interpolation or just reducing the pixels per inch setting) to get 13x19" out of a 1Ds.. but the 10D and D60 need to be almost doubled in linear size to get to that printsize.. and you definitely lose detail when you quadruple the number of pixels through interpolation.. |
|
Jeff Registered: Dec 31, 2002 Total Posts: 8532 Country: United States |
I'll strongly ditto the simple: "Yes." |