|
daverk Registered: Apr 16, 2003 Total Posts: 498 Country: United States |
I hope the new firmware doesn't clean up the camera's noise profile too much at ISOs 400 and 800. I like the noise at those speeds! Think I'll wait for more feedback on this before updating (or not). |
|
CarlG Registered: Mar 12, 2002 Total Posts: 5655 Country: United States |
Philip M wrote: |
|
Ricardo Maui Registered: Feb 11, 2002 Total Posts: 6847 Country: United States |
Philip M wrote: |
|
paganini Registered: Sep 03, 2002 Total Posts: 451 Country: United States |
Did my ruler focus test. |
|
lziering Registered: Jan 20, 2003 Total Posts: 746 Country: United States |
Does anyone know what issues Canon claims the firmwear upgrade addresses? Many of the claims I've seen here today are a bit crazy. The easiest one to test was the faster start-up claim--there is no difference with the stopwatch measured time I got before and after the upgrade. |
|
wcbert Registered: Jan 02, 2002 Total Posts: 839 Country: United States |
lziering wrote: |
|
jray Registered: Jan 06, 2002 Total Posts: 1421 Country: United States |
lou wrote: |
|
David Hankinson Registered: Sep 08, 2002 Total Posts: 211 Country: Canada |
Thanks, people. Didn't know about the firmware upgrade. Thanks to you I was able to download and install it this evening. |
|
paganini Registered: Sep 03, 2002 Total Posts: 451 Country: United States |
Shrug, all i can tell you is that the previous run of the focus test I did, i got worse results. (i have written it down) |
|
sdai Registered: Aug 26, 2002 Total Posts: 3387 Country: Canada |
Larry Mowry wrote: |
|
oreixa Registered: Mar 18, 2003 Total Posts: 102 Country: N/A |
That's not true. Canon publish waht issues are fixed in every firmware revision. Just as an example, from the last firmwareupdate to the 1Ds: |
|
BigJoe Registered: Feb 14, 2002 Total Posts: 690 Country: United States |
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/EOS10D/10D_firmware-e.html |
|
Ricardo Maui Registered: Feb 11, 2002 Total Posts: 6847 Country: United States |
Hey I' m getting 6 frames per sec................ahhhh just one more! |
|
Peter de Weerdt Registered: Feb 08, 2002 Total Posts: 3200 Country: Netherlands |
Here are Canon's official statements on improvements in the firmware: |
|
rebel300 Registered: Dec 31, 2001 Total Posts: 13832 Country: United States |
Peter...if Canon is telling the truth then why am I suddenly getting perfectly clear images at ISO 400 where before the update it was total crap and I decided to totally avoid iSO 400? |
|
Peter de Weerdt Registered: Feb 08, 2002 Total Posts: 3200 Country: Netherlands |
I can't answer for Canon. |
|
rebel300 Registered: Dec 31, 2001 Total Posts: 13832 Country: United States |
It's real on my camera Peter...Now the results at ISO 800 are exactly what I used to get at ISO 400, so now I just avoid ISO 800 as a useless setting. Also, at ISO 100 I am having to meter and use exposure comp and then go into layer masking to balance out the photo where before ISO 100 shots were pretty easy to handle (more blown highlights at ISO 100 now). |
|
BigJoe Registered: Feb 14, 2002 Total Posts: 690 Country: United States |
Canon has no problem owning up to problems in their cameras... at least with the consumer cameras like the G3 and the A40 and such. |
|
daverk Registered: Apr 16, 2003 Total Posts: 498 Country: United States |
I went ahead and installed the update last night and then went outside & took some nighttime shots at ISOs 400–3200. Comparing photos of the same subject matter taken a few weeks ago with the post-update photos I don't see any differences in noise quantity or character. Which is fine with me...I like the textural qualities of the 10D's noise at higher ISOs. |
|
detailer Registered: May 15, 2003 Total Posts: 468 Country: United Kingdom |
I have had some complications with my 10D firmware update, so went searching for a Canon source page with info + download for the update. Check out |