Stoffer wrote:
Thanks for a really great post!

This got my attention big time:


""2. The actual focus sensor arrays are three times larger than the viewfinder marks. A user could put an intended subject in the mark, but if there is a strong detail just outside the mark (but within the sensor area), the camera would focus on that strong detail. This is a source of much of the complaints of the back- or front-focusing -- especially with the "ruler tests." Also, as far as the camera is concerned, a focus lock on anything within the sensor area is good, which sometimes covers more area than the photographer intended.""

Gotta remember this that next time I use my 135L at f/2!

I keep this handy image of the 10D sensor arrangement overlaid in red on top of the sensor indicators in the viewfinder to illustrate this very point:

howgus wrote:
And from RDKirk's posts: the AF sensor size in the 20D is 3x the box size in the viewfinder! I interpret that to mean 3x linear, both horizontal and vertical for the center sensor, which comes to 9x the area.

The center is a cross-type meaning that the vertical sensor extends about 1 sensor width to either side and the horizontal sensor extends about 1 sensor's height above and below the rectangle. It isn't rectangular-shaped.

Very nice info, thanks RDKirk.

Now the same for the 1 series AF system maybe?

Thanks to Jeff and RDKirk for putting this together.

Question:

What are the chances of getting multiple cross-type sensors in a future Canon body?

I really would appreciate having *three* cross-type sensors aligned horizontally in landscape orientation (left-middle-right). When shooting sports (especially field sports-soccer, football, lacrosse, etc.) I shoot in portrait orientation using a single AF point. Most often you hear sports shooters say to use the center focus point for accuracy. However, I don't want the players belly-button in focus-I want their face in focus so I use the center upper AF point (in portrait orientation, this would be the 'right hand' AF point in landscape orientation). I've often wondered how many more shots would be in focus if this AF sensor were a cross-type?

I'm also curious if anyone else uses this focus point instead of the center AF point and what they're thought are.

Thanks

after reading that, i gotta give RDKirk a big thank you. this should be mandatory reading for anyone shooting a canon dslr. THANKS! Also thanks to the poster for finding this and making it available.

I wonder if there might be some interaction between continuous shooting mode and the focus system. I don't see discussion of this here. I seem to remember reading somewhere that when the camera is in continuous mode, it shifts from focus priority to shutter button priority, meaning that it will take the shot even if the lens has not achieved focus, even if the camera setting is one-shot focus mode. I'd be grateful for some definitive information about this.

AI Focus: The camera is normally in One Shot mode and the shutter will lock until it achieves focus. However, if it detects the subject moving (that is, the subject goes out of focus), it will automatically switch into AI Servo mode and try to maintain focus. If you are focusing on something that frequently stays still but could move suddenly (like a toddler) this mode comes in handy. The important point wiht AI Focus is that it does not lock the shutter. However, the camera will usually interpret "focus and recompose" as movement of the subject, and will refocus.

Just out of curiosity, if in AI Focus and you've focused on a subject that then begins to move. The above states the the autofocus system will automatically switch to AI Servo mode in order to attempt to keep the subject in focus. I assume this means that you must then depress and hold the * button again to attain and maintain focus, correct? (I've got parameter 14 set to 1).

Mongrel wrote:
Question:

What are the chances of getting multiple cross-type sensors in a future Canon body?


As far as I know, most 1-series bodies (I think some of the older models not) have more cross type sensors. For example, the 1D has 7 cross type sensors.

The center sensor is cross-type for lenses with a maximum aperture of f/4 or larger. The other 6 sensors are cross-type for an aperture of f/2.8 or larger. If the aperture is smaller, these sensors will act as horizontal sensor.

1 series and EOS 3

Thanks to lexvo and Tim Chong for clarifying that. I remembered that the 1 series had multiple cross-type sensors but had forgotten where they were located. However, they are not optimized for shooting AI servo in portrait orientation-imho.

I took the liberty of copying the above gif to show the placement I was referring to in my post above.

I'd like to see Canon utilize cross-type sensors at the points circled below:



Well, I missed the uppermost one I wanted to circle , but you get my drift .

This would be ideal (imho) for tracking a player in American football, soccer, field hockey, lacrosse, rugby etc. It would give the option of focusing on the players face or helmet, or in the case of soccer and field hockey the ball. The way Canon has them laid out you would almost be better off shooting everything in landscape for the most accurate AF and then cropping the sides off.

If you use the center AF point and hold it on the players head you wind up with a whole lot of dead space at the top of the frame that needs to be cropped out.

I would gladly give up a most of the 45 AF sensors if I could get 10 or 12 cross type sensors where I want them

thanks again to lexvo and Tim...

Something dawned on me as I've been sitting here editing autocross shot with a 20D and 70-200 F4. Focus tracking is better than everything I've ever had before, but it isn't perfect. Now I've realized that I've been shooting in Tv and Av modes. I recall reading somewhere that a single processor in the 20D controls focus and exposure, while the 1-series has a second processor that frees up the first for AF-only tasks. This is part of the reason why the 1-series has faster AF.

Let's say I set my 20D into Manual exposure mode. Will this improve focus tracking, as I've given the processor one less thing -- autoexposure -- to compute?

Sometimes I have CF4=3 set (so * button activates AF, and there is no AE lock). Since the camera is always assessing exposure in this condition, am I compromising AF speed?

Would I have the best hopes for AF by setting CF4 so I have AE lock, and keeping the camera in M?

I buy my camera for take photos not for read a book every week.

Elías

Steve_T90 wrote:
Something dawned on me as I've been sitting here editing autocross shot with a 20D and 70-200 F4. Focus tracking is better than everything I've ever had before, but it isn't perfect. Now I've realized that I've been shooting in Tv and Av modes. I recall reading somewhere that a single processor in the 20D controls focus and exposure, while the 1-series has a second processor that frees up the first for AF-only tasks. This is part of the reason why the 1-series has faster AF.

Let's say I set my 20D into Manual exposure mode. Will this improve focus tracking, as I've given the processor one less thing -- autoexposure -- to compute?

Sometimes I have CF4=3 set (so * button activates AF, and there is no AE lock). Since the camera is always assessing exposure in this condition, am I compromising AF speed?

Would I have the best hopes for AF by setting CF4 so I have AE lock, and keeping the camera in M?

Steve has a good point. Anybody?

Matt

I think the camera is still computing exposure if you set it to manual exposure. The light meter (on the right on my 1D) is showing over- or underexposure.

Thanks guys. Lexvo says what I kind of suspected after some more time thinking about it.

The only other thing I thought would make a difference is the CF control of AF/AE, so I tested out Lexvo's statement for myself. No matter what CF4 is set to, manual exposure calculation is never locked on my 20D. Just as well for Canon, as I can imagine that they would be less than thrilled if people started saying, "The 20D can't walk and chew gum at the same time..."

1D-ADs AF Coverage (by Chuck Westfall)

http://www.pbase.com/chuckwestfall/image/18921329

freelancer wrote:
1D-ADs AF Coverage (by Chuck Westfall)

http://www.pbase.com/chuckwestfall/image/18921329


Thanks for the link! I found the 10D CMOS sensor diagram really interesting! Id like to find out more about all those filters placed in front of the sensor.

Hmmm..lots of info here to digest. I was shooting birds a few weeks back with a 70-300 lens at 300...and the point of focus seemed to not agree with the center point, so that bit about the focus screen not being exaclty aligned to the sensors is true.

The info about the direction of the sensors sensitivity is very useful. Have to remember that one.

I s'pose the triple precision with 2.8 and faster lenses is not a feature of the 300D...is it in the 350d?

OK, so if I wanted to test a 70-200 f4, what's the best mention to do it? I think it's backfocusing pretty bad at 70mm and looks OK at 200. If I download the chart at http://www.photo.net/learn/focustest/ how far away should I be at 70 and 200? This is on a 300d.

Thanks,
Chris

Steve_T90 wrote:
The only other thing I thought would make a difference is the CF control of AF/AE, so I tested out Lexvo's statement for myself. No matter what CF4 is set to, manual exposure calculation is never locked on my 20D. Just as well for Canon, as I can imagine that they would be less than thrilled if people started saying, "The 20D can't walk and chew gum at the same time..."

What do you mean by this. If it's a manual exposure then by definition it's a locked exposure. You've set aperture and shutter speed, and they are now fixed. Exposure lock only makes sense in the context of AE. The camera may indicate that the locked exposure is different to it's metered value as you swing the camera around, but it doen't affect your settings.

Folks..., would someone in the know please clarify one thing in regards to the "f2.8 or faster lens" & "increased sensor capability" feature. I have read the Westfall article several times, btw...

When a lens with a maximum aperture capability of f2.8 or greater is attached:
a) the increased sensitivity is available while using "any" aperture on that lens.

b) the increased sensitivity is available when the aperture of the attached lens is set to f2.8 or greater.

Hope I have made myself clear with this wording.

Thanks,
Doug

damjr1 wrote:
Folks..., would someone in the know please clarify one thing in regards to the "f2.8 or faster lens" & "increased sensor capability" feature. I have read the Westfall article several times, btw...

When a lens with a maximum aperture capability of f2.8 or greater is attached:
a) the increased sensitivity is available while using "any" aperture on that lens.

b) the increased sensitivity is available when the aperture of the attached lens is set to f2.8 or greater.

Hope I have made myself clear with this wording.

Thanks,
Doug


When you attach a lens with a maxium aperture of f2.8 or greater, the camera turns on a second vertical line of phase detection pixels in the center sensor pixel array.

This is what Canon calls the "high precision" mode and supposedly will place the actual plane of focus within 1/3 of the depth of focus (the level of accuracy at the sensor plane).

It appears to me that switching on the additional sensor is a function of the identification information the lens provides to the camera ("My maximum aperture is f2.8") rather than the amount of light being transmitted by the lens. I believe it applies to any shooting aperture used while that lens is mounted--the camera always uses the maximum aperture depth of focus factor for all its focus solutions, not the shooting aperture.

I don't have a document stating this outright, but looking at the chain of events depicted in Canon's patent application, the camera calculates the focus solution for a shot before it calculates the exposure solution (this is definitely true when using evaluative mode autoexposure), so when it sends the movement command to the lens, it doesn't yet know what the shooting aperture will be.

sounds logical to me...thank you for that response

as an aside, I have read posts were a few have referenced patent apps...
is that available for us all ? it looks like one may gleam a few technical insights and gain a light more of an understanding of their products...

wonder if calling Canon tech, they would happily share a little knowledge?

take care,
Doug

damjr1 wrote:
sounds logical to me...thank you for that response

as an aside, I have read posts were a few have referenced patent apps...
is that available for us all ? it looks like one may gleam a few technical insights and gain a light more of an understanding of their products...

wonder if calling Canon tech, they would happily share a little knowledge?

take care,
Doug

Check in the first sticky post--I listed the patent number and a web site to pull the application as a PDF.