|
Martin Good Registered: Mar 16, 2008 Total Posts: 20309 Country: Switzerland |
Very nice and clear tutorial Tim and good to see that it's like my own method |
|
eyelaser Registered: Oct 29, 2005 Total Posts: 13340 Country: United States |
Well demonstrated. My technique is a little different but accomplishes the same thing. |
|
treebeard Registered: Sep 21, 2006 Total Posts: 5604 Country: United States |
Thanks Tim, much appreciated. |
|
dioladetus Registered: Oct 21, 2009 Total Posts: 136 Country: Denmark |
Good stuff Tim! |
|
72chevelle454 Registered: Dec 04, 2005 Total Posts: 14322 Country: United States |
I find earplugs work best... all the noise is gone then |
|
Ernie Aubert Registered: Apr 19, 2007 Total Posts: 3692 Country: United States |
I just tried that, Tim. After applying the noise reduction, twice, on the inverted selection, I'm still seeing the selection with the moving border (and a moving border around the perimeter of the frame as well); how do I finalize that action so I can do something else? |
|
No ANgle Registered: Dec 13, 2012 Total Posts: 187 Country: United States |
Good post with an easy method to learn that can make huge improvements to pictures. I do it much the same but with a slight change is all. There are more than one way to skin the cat in PS that is for sure. |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
Ernie Aubert wrote: |
|
Ernie Aubert Registered: Apr 19, 2007 Total Posts: 3692 Country: United States |
Got it! Thanks, Tim. Now, however, I'm quite befuddled by something: After doing that, I invoked Topaz DeNoise 5, and its action isn't affecting the original subject area, only that surrounding area to which I'd applied the CS6 noise reduction. I'm cunfoozed. |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
You didn't say you wanted to still use the selection |
|
Ernie Aubert Registered: Apr 19, 2007 Total Posts: 3692 Country: United States |
Hah! I didn't want to still use the selection... I'm not accomplished with much of what selections can be used for. So far, I've just used them primarily for content-aware fill. So I'm still at the stage of finding out the basics. I did what you just said, and indeed it worked that way. Before, I was thinking DeNoise would work on the whole image; I didn't know it was smart enough to detect a selection and operate only on that. Thanks! |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
Ernie Aubert wrote: |
|
surfnron Registered: Dec 17, 2004 Total Posts: 23183 Country: United States |
72chevelle454 wrote: |
|
Dan Heitman Registered: Jun 13, 2011 Total Posts: 191 Country: Canada |
Thanks for the info Tim, much appreciated. |
|
No ANgle Registered: Dec 13, 2012 Total Posts: 187 Country: United States |
You shouldnt need to use a 3rd party program for noise. PS can do it all very well. The other thing I may add to the process is for the areas that you cant get separated with the quick select tool because they are to small or the tool wants to select more than you want it to is to just leave it alone and do the process as usual then flatten the layer and go back in those areas you couldnt get and use the blur tool on them. |
|
randysc Registered: May 13, 2009 Total Posts: 2066 Country: United States |
Good info Tim, I don't have PS so I use a plug-in called Neat Image, works pretty good. |
|
DonGut Registered: Nov 28, 2008 Total Posts: 5847 Country: Canada |
Great tips as always. Don |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
surfnron wrote: |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
No ANgle wrote: |
|
Tim Kuhn Registered: Nov 29, 2006 Total Posts: 38879 Country: United States |
So glad you like this post everybody. Thanks for all the comments |