|
godfather Registered: Aug 13, 2004 Total Posts: 1919 Country: United States |
I'd really like to see canon put out some more pancake lenses. I use my 40 often as a lens and body cap and would like some other choices for FL. Ideally an EF-S 14, EF 20, and ~EF 100. I'm not too concerned with speed although 2.8 would be great. Price is not a major concern if they stay below $400 each... |
|
Wahoowa Registered: Feb 13, 2011 Total Posts: 1163 Country: United States |
Yes, I would like to see more pancake lenses from Canon. I own both 35L and 50L and, surprisingly, I'm happy with the 40mm. |
|
jaybird555 Registered: Jun 22, 2010 Total Posts: 672 Country: United States |
You'll have to wait till Canon merges with I-HOP |
|
godfather Registered: Aug 13, 2004 Total Posts: 1919 Country: United States |
Good point...I guess I'd really like to see a ef-s 14 pancake lens for rebel sized cameras...that and the 40 would make a great crop sensor kit. |
|
mpmendenhall Registered: Aug 09, 2008 Total Posts: 1934 Country: United States |
An ~20mm pancake prime has been done several times in the past (e.g. Olympus Zuiko 21/3.5 and Voigtlander 20/3.5 SL-II are quite compact), so this is quite possible. A 100mm lens several times shorter than its focal length would be more an (unlikely) unprecedented accomplishment. Olympus made a rather compact 100/2.8, but "rather compact" in this case means almost as small as a typical 50mm lens, not pancake-sized. |
|
RobDickinson Registered: Sep 25, 2009 Total Posts: 2768 Country: New Zealand |
An EF 14mm f4 or f5.6 would do me! |
|
Gochugogi Registered: Jun 25, 2003 Total Posts: 8355 Country: United States |
The retrofocus design for wide angle requires a lot more elements in order to get enough distance between the rear element and the CMOS plane. More elements means a longer barrel is needed to house those elements. It would be possible for the EOS-M since there is no mirror box to worry about (hence retrofocus not needed). |
|
p666 Registered: Oct 29, 2012 Total Posts: 26 Country: Australia |
28mm pancake would be interesting too, Industar (USSR) has done them in the past. |
|
Wahoowa Registered: Feb 13, 2011 Total Posts: 1163 Country: United States |
mpmendenhall wrote: |
|
EB-1 Registered: Jan 09, 2003 Total Posts: 20205 Country: United States |
Any chance of a 400/2.8 pancake? |
|
mpmendenhall Registered: Aug 09, 2008 Total Posts: 1934 Country: United States |
Wahoowa wrote: |
|
darknite Registered: Jan 04, 2006 Total Posts: 435 Country: United States |
EEww no...... not at the current aperture and price. . There is no reason the current 40 couldn't have been an f/2.0 instead of 2.8 |
|
Gochugogi Registered: Jun 25, 2003 Total Posts: 8355 Country: United States |
darknite wrote: |
|
WAYCOOL Registered: May 15, 2004 Total Posts: 2310 Country: United States |
The instant rebate suggests the EF40 2.8 may go up to $199 in January. Guess its time to buy Christmas present for myself. |
|
goosemang Registered: Oct 21, 2011 Total Posts: 1109 Country: United States |
i'd love to see a 24mm f2.8 pancake |
|
goosemang Registered: Oct 21, 2011 Total Posts: 1109 Country: United States |
WAYCOOL wrote: |
|
Wahoowa Registered: Feb 13, 2011 Total Posts: 1163 Country: United States |
mpmendenhall wrote: |
|
Yakim Peled Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 16903 Country: Israel |
The whole Zuiko line is FF compatible (film... |
|
jamesf99 Registered: Oct 09, 2004 Total Posts: 7238 Country: United States |
EB-1 wrote: |