|
misteral Registered: Aug 24, 2012 Total Posts: 2 Country: Canada |
Hello! |
|
Mishu01 Registered: Nov 20, 2009 Total Posts: 2149 Country: Romania |
Well... English is not my first language but IMHO the quote is not about exposure... 1/250 is the sync speed so the camera will record more motion blur from a longer lens than from a shorter one... ideally you need to shoot at least at 1/focal length seconds in order to avoid motion blur... When the sync speed is 1/250 is obviously that the shorter lens acts better... |
|
misteral Registered: Aug 24, 2012 Total Posts: 2 Country: Canada |
Your English is better than my Romanian |
|
Mishu01 Registered: Nov 20, 2009 Total Posts: 2149 Country: Romania |
Correct! That's why he counts five compromises... not just the usual three from the exposure triangle. Bringing a flash in the equation when shooting with long lenses is tricky. (well, for me flash is always tricky |
|
Steve Wylie Registered: Feb 13, 2007 Total Posts: 965 Country: United States |
It's simply that motion blur will show up more with a longer lens than with a wider lens. More pixels are devoted to the blurry area in a close-up photo than in a wider one. That's why wide-angle landscape shots appear to be sharper than closeups. The flash does not change the "stopping power" from one lens to another. |