|
Liquidstone Registered: Jan 14, 2005 Total Posts: 1205 Country: Philippines |
I've used both the 1D2 and 7D a lot for birding, and I'd prefer the 7D hands down. About the only area where the 1D2 is better is weather sealing. Even AF at f/8 isn't an advantage because the 7D bare + any lens has longer reach than the 1D2 + 1.4x TC + the same lens. |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 18026 Country: Australia |
Liquidstone wrote: |
|
e.aland Registered: Jun 18, 2009 Total Posts: 165 Country: Switzerland |
morenoar wrote: |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 18026 Country: Australia |
e.aland wrote: |
|
aznature Registered: Dec 01, 2005 Total Posts: 156 Country: United States |
***********7D END OF STORY*********** |
|
BobMarkey Registered: Jan 28, 2010 Total Posts: 33 Country: United States |
Because there are many 1DMKII users here, I have to ask whether your LCD shows images much lighter tan they actually appear on your computer or in print? Mine (1DMKIIn) sure does! |
|
BrianO Registered: Aug 21, 2008 Total Posts: 7854 Country: United States |
I'm not a 1D (of any flavor) user, but I never rely on the LCD image for white balance or exposure (other than blown highlights). I'll use it to check framing and focus, and to look for motion blur, but for exposure I use the meter and the histogram, and for color I use a gray card or other standard reference in the shot and balance in post. (Or I'll shoot a frame-filling shot of a gray or white card, and set a CWB if I'm needing a nearly-spot-on JPEG straight out of camera.) |
|
ggOk Registered: Sep 28, 2011 Total Posts: 375 Country: United States |
I have both 7D and 1D2. I rarely use these bodies but each has their own pros and cons. |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 18026 Country: Australia |
BobMarkey wrote: |