|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2336 Country: United States |
Received my 2nd copy, which has only a 1/2 stop miscalibration on the aperture lever vs a full stop on my first copy. ![]() Decentering at middle distances: ![]() * IQ * My second copy is extremely sharp at all focal lengths, much more so than my first copy. Even at f/2.8 there is an abundance of detail and contrast. Lens is sharp edge-to-edge at f/5.6 and above. There is some CA/fringing, even up to f/5.6, depending on the scene. IQ is a bit less at MFD vs middle-to-infinity focus distances. Flare control seems decent. Bokeh is a bit nervous and lens suffers from the previously-reported "onion bokeh" effect of concentric circles for OOF highlights. * AF * AF speed is very fast, just a click off the Nikon 24-70. Focus appears accurate thus far - my 2nd copy tuned at 0 on both my D800 and D3s. * Sample photos * Here are some sample photos, on both the D800 and D3s. All were shot raw and sharpened in two passes (raw + large-radius USM in CS5). Full-sized images are available in the gallery, and EXIF is maintained. All of the D3s images were indoors at very low shutter speeds. I expect to add more images in the coming week. http://horshack.smugmug.com/Category/Tamron-24-70-Review/25479188_jTFjgq#!i=2099113768&k=kpbBFFT * Conclusion * The lens has sample variation/new-model teething problems but if you can find a copy with only a slight aperture calibration error, "break-in" the VC, and get a sharp copy...the hassle IMO is very much worth it. |
|
Jammy Straub Registered: Jan 28, 2007 Total Posts: 6869 Country: United States |
Wow, that really makes me want to buy one... ... ... Not. |
|
vchowdhary Registered: Jul 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1160 Country: N/A |
Always very detailed and lot of data points for any conclusions from Snapsy. |
|
EB-1 Registered: Jan 09, 2003 Total Posts: 20240 Country: United States |
Yikes that is a bad one. My Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC (Canon EF) was more closely symmetrical, but not optically overwhelming. However, a good copy is such a unique lens and sufficient for many purposes. There is no other 24-70 lens with f/2.8 and image stabilization. |
|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2336 Country: United States |
EB-1 wrote: |
|
gugs Registered: Apr 16, 2005 Total Posts: 7245 Country: Belgium |
Jammy Straub wrote: |
|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2336 Country: United States |
I took some better samples today. Here's the gallery, all with the D800, hand-held, and @ f/2.8. All processed heavily in LR4, including extensive sharpening. I've enabled the full 36MP images for viewing, and EXIF is intact. |
|
drbabz Registered: Sep 30, 2012 Total Posts: 1 Country: N/A |
i think this sentence nicely summed it up: |
|
Airphoto Registered: Jan 20, 2006 Total Posts: 533 Country: United States |
IT is really amazing that for $1300 Tamron has such quality issues. I think i need to let the dust settle and look again |
|
MackDaddy1962 Registered: Jan 13, 2010 Total Posts: 775 Country: United States |
drbabz wrote: |
|
NathanHamler Registered: Sep 25, 2009 Total Posts: 1724 Country: United States |
Prob would make a good video only lens, where the perceived sharpness is less in the final product...and where the VC is constantly engaged vs clicking on and off like with stills... |
|
geniousc Registered: May 08, 2005 Total Posts: 1676 Country: United States |
I had focusing problems with my first copy and returned it. The second one is incredible and right up with primes. I own a LOT of lenses. I didn't have exposure problems with either one nor did I notice any break-in period. Maybe it was just my technique. |