|
Gonemad Registered: Sep 02, 2009 Total Posts: 50 Country: United States |
I have a Canon 7D with the latest firmware v2.0. For the longest time, I've shot in AV mode with fixed ISO (sports + BIF) and let the camera adjust the correct shutter speed (usually around 1/1500s). After nearly 10K shots, I got really mixed results especially in a long sequence of continuous AI Servo shots. More often than not, 30% of shots in the sequence are blurred while pictures just before and right after are in focus, even though ZoomBrowser showed the focus dead center on the target. I use Canon 70-200 IS USM MK2 and I have tried setting AV wide open (f2.8) as well as f4 and f5.6 with similar blur results in the sequence. This inconsistency drove me nuts! |
|
Russ Isabella Registered: Jan 30, 2005 Total Posts: 9402 Country: United States |
Gone: My first question is what kind of a scenario are you shooting in where you would expect drastic changes in the free-to-change camera setting? What you've described implies that whatever settings you are using, you are experiencing significant changes to shutter speed or ISO in the course of a sequence of shots. Unless your shutter speed is falling to a slow enough setting that you are experiencing motion blur, it is difficult to understand why one of the options you've asked about would be better than another. Capturing and maintaining focus throughout a sequence of shots should have much more to do with the AF system and settings, and your technique, than whether you are in auto-ISO or AV mode. Perhaps some sample photos would be helpful here. |
|
P Alesse Registered: Dec 25, 2004 Total Posts: 10963 Country: United States |
Agreed with Russ... AF performance and tracking have nothing to do with the camera's exposure settings. Something else is at play here. |
|
Angry Registered: Nov 08, 2011 Total Posts: 1062 Country: Australia |
I shoot action Sports & Motorsports.. |
|
Ralph Thompson Registered: Jan 02, 2008 Total Posts: 1101 Country: United States |
Here are my thoughts: |
|
gschlact Registered: Jun 04, 2011 Total Posts: 600 Country: United States |
My thoughts for the OP. |
|
Skwirnmn Registered: Jan 17, 2012 Total Posts: 138 Country: N/A |
I think I'm understanding where the OP is coming from, however I don't have an answer for him. |
|
cbrenkus Registered: Oct 05, 2007 Total Posts: 461 Country: United States |
I used auto ISO on my MKIV Friday night at the local H/S football game and it worked great. As the night wore on I switched back and forth from manual to auto and got good results in both cases. |
|
Gonemad Registered: Sep 02, 2009 Total Posts: 50 Country: United States |
Thanks everyone for chiming in. For the sake of time, I won't address each and every comment, but here are the top 2 category of comments that I'll address: |
|
Skwirnmn Registered: Jan 17, 2012 Total Posts: 138 Country: N/A |
I'd upload a few examples.. that makes no sense to me what so ever. |
|
lighthawk Registered: Jul 10, 2005 Total Posts: 206 Country: United States |
Gonemad wrote: |
|
Gonemad Registered: Sep 02, 2009 Total Posts: 50 Country: United States |
So, after reading lots of articles about the Canon 7D autofocus sensor, here's one reviewer who experienced the same AF "backfocus" when the subject is running towards the camera: |
|
Jase1125 Registered: Jan 12, 2011 Total Posts: 242 Country: United States |
Sounds like this is a tracking problem only. Therefore, I suggest changing two custom functions until you figure out your best hit rate. I believe it varies person to person as an individuals ability / technique impact these settings. |
|
gschlact Registered: Jun 04, 2011 Total Posts: 600 Country: United States |
Gonemad, |