OM-D & PEN Images
/forum/topic/1127925/100

1       2       3              100      
101
       102              250       251       end

darrellc
Registered: Jan 02, 2005
Total Posts: 385
Country: N/A

OM-D with 12-35, Guggenheim in NYC


Guggenheim by DarrellC, on Flickr



savingspaces
Registered: Oct 01, 2012
Total Posts: 839
Country: United States

OMD/60mm


P1260008.jpg by savingspaces33, on Flickr



darrellc
Registered: Jan 02, 2005
Total Posts: 385
Country: N/A

OM-D with 75/1.8 from Brooklyn Bridge


Empire State Building over Tenements by DarrellC, on Flickr



itai195
Registered: Aug 08, 2011
Total Posts: 1113
Country: United States

Great work everyone. It's really inspiring to see what you all are accomplishing with the OM-D.

Here's a new shot of the munchkin, this time under slightly less natural light than before



OM-D with the Panasonic 25. Admittedly I'd planned to use my D800 for this, but all my batteries had mysteriously drained and, well, infants don't like waiting.



dukenukem
Registered: Oct 04, 2012
Total Posts: 243
Country: Spain

M.Zuiko 9-18


Diagonal Acusada por _dUkEnUkEm_, en Flickr



DougVaughn
Registered: May 31, 2010
Total Posts: 199
Country: United States

Itai195... great shot of your baby! I like the octagon catch lights in the eyes, and the lighting in general is very pleasing.



DougVaughn
Registered: May 31, 2010
Total Posts: 199
Country: United States

dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?



dukenukem
Registered: Oct 04, 2012
Total Posts: 243
Country: Spain

DougVaughn wrote:
dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?


2 secs, you should play with the exposure time and the force of the sea.

Thanks.



slobodan
Registered: Sep 25, 2004
Total Posts: 623
Country: United States

darrellc wrote:
OM-D with 75/1.8 from Brooklyn Bridge...


That would be Chrysler building, not Empire State, no?



darrellc
Registered: Jan 02, 2005
Total Posts: 385
Country: N/A

Yep, Chrysler Bldg, will change title over at Flickr, hopefully that updates it here as well... thx!



michael49
Registered: Jun 09, 2006
Total Posts: 5364
Country: United States

dukenukem wrote:
DougVaughn wrote:
dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?


2 secs, you should play with the exposure time and the force of the sea.

Thanks.


Awesome, love the composition and perfect exposure time.



IDURITA
Registered: Jan 13, 2005
Total Posts: 628
Country: India

dukenukem,

I like that image very much. What was the camera.

Would that lens be better than the Panasonic 7-14mm ?

Does it work well with the OM-D ?



IDURITA
Registered: Jan 13, 2005
Total Posts: 628
Country: India

I am still enjoying our vacation in our little nursery in the Philippines.

The following pictures have been taken with the OM-D and f/2 150mm swd plus 2X TC.

This would be 600mm focal length in 35mm terms. All taken with the support of a monopod.

I just wanted to test the IQ with the 2X TC. I think it is not bad.

























And a bird picture with the same combo.

Brown Shrike, a native of the Philippine low-land.









old yorker
Registered: Jun 26, 2008
Total Posts: 212
Country: N/A

IDURITA

How is the autofocus with your long lens setup? Accurate? I am guessing it might be a little slow. Is that fair?

Thanks



IDURITA
Registered: Jan 13, 2005
Total Posts: 628
Country: India

It is accurate. I have only very few out-of-focus images, mostly due to user mistake (shake at too low exposure times). And indeed, autofocus is a bit slow.



Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 9827
Country: United States

Three from tonight with the 14/2.5 pancake (which I'm falling in love with...just so little and pretty darn good.) I'm swapping my Oly 12/2 for it, to free up money to pay for the Fuji X100s I've got on pre-order. These are all handheld.



















owyhee
Registered: May 10, 2008
Total Posts: 429
Country: United States

Fog at Morris Hill Cemetery. 45mm f/5.6. Processed with Topaz B&W.



gotak
Registered: Aug 24, 2009
Total Posts: 338
Country: Canada







old yorker
Registered: Jun 26, 2008
Total Posts: 212
Country: N/A

IDURITA wrote:
It is accurate. I have only very few out-of-focus images, mostly due to user mistake (shake at too low exposure times). And indeed, autofocus is a bit slow.



Thanks. That's very helpful. I wish Olympus would make some of their fine 4/3rds telephotos for m4/3rds with quicker AF.



dukenukem
Registered: Oct 04, 2012
Total Posts: 243
Country: Spain


Estelas Doradas por _dUkEnUkEm_, en Flickr
Pana 45-200 . 1/800s . f/7.1 . ISO 200 . 140 mm



1       2       3              100      
101
       102              250       251       end