OM-D with 12-35, Guggenheim in NYC


Guggenheim by DarrellC, on Flickr

OMD/60mm


P1260008.jpg by savingspaces33, on Flickr

OM-D with 75/1.8 from Brooklyn Bridge


Empire State Building over Tenements by DarrellC, on Flickr

Great work everyone. It's really inspiring to see what you all are accomplishing with the OM-D.

Here's a new shot of the munchkin, this time under slightly less natural light than before



OM-D with the Panasonic 25. Admittedly I'd planned to use my D800 for this, but all my batteries had mysteriously drained and, well, infants don't like waiting.

M.Zuiko 9-18


Diagonal Acusada por _dUkEnUkEm_, en Flickr

Itai195... great shot of your baby! I like the octagon catch lights in the eyes, and the lighting in general is very pleasing.

dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?

DougVaughn wrote:
dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?

2 secs, you should play with the exposure time and the force of the sea.

Thanks.

darrellc wrote:
OM-D with 75/1.8 from Brooklyn Bridge...

That would be Chrysler building, not Empire State, no?

Yep, Chrysler Bldg, will change title over at Flickr, hopefully that updates it here as well... thx!

dukenukem wrote:
DougVaughn wrote:
dukenukem, the waves look great in the photo above. I've tried this before, and it looked OK, but not nearly as dramatic as yours. How long was the exposure?

2 secs, you should play with the exposure time and the force of the sea.

Thanks.

Awesome, love the composition and perfect exposure time.

dukenukem,

I like that image very much. What was the camera.

Would that lens be better than the Panasonic 7-14mm ?

Does it work well with the OM-D ?

I am still enjoying our vacation in our little nursery in the Philippines.

The following pictures have been taken with the OM-D and f/2 150mm swd plus 2X TC.

This would be 600mm focal length in 35mm terms. All taken with the support of a monopod.

I just wanted to test the IQ with the 2X TC. I think it is not bad.

IDURITA

How is the autofocus with your long lens setup? Accurate? I am guessing it might be a little slow. Is that fair?

Thanks

It is accurate. I have only very few out-of-focus images, mostly due to user mistake (shake at too low exposure times). And indeed, autofocus is a bit slow.

Three from tonight with the 14/2.5 pancake (which I'm falling in love with...just so little and pretty darn good.) I'm swapping my Oly 12/2 for it, to free up money to pay for the Fuji X100s I've got on pre-order. These are all handheld.

Fog at Morris Hill Cemetery. 45mm f/5.6. Processed with Topaz B&W.

IDURITA wrote:
It is accurate. I have only very few out-of-focus images, mostly due to user mistake (shake at too low exposure times). And indeed, autofocus is a bit slow.


Thanks. That's very helpful. I wish Olympus would make some of their fine 4/3rds telephotos for m4/3rds with quicker AF.

Estelas Doradas por _dUkEnUkEm_, en Flickr
Pana 45-200 . 1/800s . f/7.1 . ISO 200 . 140 mm