f/1.2 or faster lenses wide open
/forum/topic/1104043/28

1       2       3              28      
29
       30              36       37       end

buggz2k
Registered: Mar 10, 2010
Total Posts: 1288
Country: United States

^very nice one Paul!



Paul Yi
Registered: Dec 10, 2004
Total Posts: 5005
Country: United States

Thanks for your nice comment....
it is a very nice lens indeed...



Jim Schemel
Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Total Posts: 4547
Country: United States

Nice comp on the bench Paul
-Jim



Bifurcator
Registered: Oct 22, 2008
Total Posts: 8342
Country: Japan

LeadyGonzales wrote:
Oh ha,

just 1.2: however, .....

PenF 42mm 1.2 wide open:

This image is copyrighted by the owner


- L.



Man, that looks cool! The harsh transition makes this shot surreal ¡

I dig it!



JaKo
Registered: Aug 08, 2011
Total Posts: 252
Country: Canada

Paul: lens aside, that's a terrific capture. Great colour balance!


Nikkor 50/1.2 AI-s again.
Not sure about the cause of blurr on the second image though...



This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner




michael49
Registered: Jun 09, 2006
Total Posts: 4996
Country: United States

Paul Yi wrote:
That smooth bokeh reminds me of Volna-9 ......

Here is one from Rokkor 58/1.2 ....



I love bench shots and this one rocks - very nice.



Paul Yi
Registered: Dec 10, 2004
Total Posts: 5005
Country: United States

Thank you everyone for nice comments...


here is one more from the Rokkor 58/1.2....






zhangyue
Registered: Jan 28, 2011
Total Posts: 1492
Country: United States

^^Nice^^

WO?



Paul Yi
Registered: Dec 10, 2004
Total Posts: 5005
Country: United States

Wide Open....



Gunzorro
Registered: Aug 28, 2010
Total Posts: 4420
Country: United States

50/1.2 L, 1D Mark III



This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner




Paul Yi
Registered: Dec 10, 2004
Total Posts: 5005
Country: United States

Rokkor 58/1.2 ......






Brody LeBlanc
Registered: Oct 04, 2007
Total Posts: 942
Country: Canada

Alright guys, I can't decide... f 42/1.2, rokkor 58/1.2, or pentax 50/1.2?
I'm leaning towards the 42mm f1.2 as I will be using it on a APC-s camera.



sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 7015
Country: United States

Brody LeBlanc wrote:
Alright guys, I can't decide... f 42/1.2, rokkor 58/1.2, or pentax 50/1.2?
I'm leaning towards the 42mm f1.2 as I will be using it on a APC-s camera.


the 42mm is awesome on small cameras – it is tiny:


This image is copyrighted by the owner



it's also probably the hardest lens of those three to master. it is quite sharp but has an unusual spherical aberration and field curvature that can yield a unique look and surprisingly large dof at f/1.2.

a couple of shots demonstrating some of the funky bokeh possibilities:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

and closeup:


This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner




stopped down it is extremely sharp with medium contrast, but it has noticeable laCA and barrel distortion. it also has a severe flare problem shooting city lights stopped down at night.


Brody LeBlanc
Registered: Oct 04, 2007
Total Posts: 942
Country: Canada

sebboh wrote:
Brody LeBlanc wrote:
Alright guys, I can't decide... f 42/1.2, rokkor 58/1.2, or pentax 50/1.2?
I'm leaning towards the 42mm f1.2 as I will be using it on a APC-s camera.


the 42mm is awesome on small cameras – it is tiny:


This image is copyrighted by the owner



it's also probably the hardest lens of those three to master. it is quite sharp but has an unusual spherical aberration and field curvature that can yield a unique look and surprisingly large dof at f/1.2.


The size different alone is an encouraging factor and I hope it balances well on the X-Pro1.
Your pictures have definitely influenced my decision to go with the pen f 42mm, your flickr has some incredible shots from the 42mm & many other lenses too.
The 42mm seems to be a one of a kind lens, the rendering slightly reminds me of a 50mm f1.5 Sonnar I use to own.
The size of the lens and how character-rich the rendering is at f1.2 are the two main reasons why I'm going with the 42mm. I also think I'll get more use from the focal length.
Though it might not have the technical perfection that a lens like the 58/1.2 might have, I think it'll make for some very unique images.
It's interesting you say that the lens renders a fairly large DOF at f1.2. Why do you think that would be?
From looking through images from the lens on APS-c cameras (including your shots), I got the impression that the lens can create quite a noticeable separation from the focal point to the background.
I mean, clearly a 42mm lens will have more depth than a 50mm/55mm/58mm, but do you think there's even more of a reason for the large DOF?
Thanks for your input! I'd have to say you've very clearly mastered using the 42/1.2.


Mescalamba
Registered: Jul 06, 2011
Total Posts: 2164
Country: Czech Republic

Wouldnt be 35mm f1.2 v2 from CV better?

Reason for larger apparent DOF is spherical aberration, same as with 50mm f1.2 L from Canon.

58mm f1.2 without hesitation, 50mm f1.2 Pentax - hm some are good, some great, some so-so.. guess it depends on version or batch, but probably decent solution.

Still I think that f1.2 lens or faster for APS-C and if it should be "only" lens, it should be either long (58mm) or short (35mm). 42mm is interesting, but most people dont have sebbohs skill..



Brody LeBlanc
Registered: Oct 04, 2007
Total Posts: 942
Country: Canada

Mescalamba wrote:

Still I think that f1.2 lens or faster for APS-C and if it should be "only" lens, it should be either long (58mm) or short (35mm). 42mm is interesting, but most people dont have sebbohs skill..


I've owned the 35/1.2II, great lens but I don't need to overlap focal lengths and already have Fuji's 35mm f1.4 which works great on the X-Pro1.
I enjoy shooting portraits loosely and this is the reason why I'm excited about the 42mm, around a 60mm equivalent.
I'll be getting either the Canon FD 55/1.2 or Rokkor 58/1.2 soon enough, but I feel those will be easier to find compared to the 42/1.2 and I happened to find a clean copy of the Olympus located in Canada.
I guess I'm making the slightly riskier option, but I'm too intrigued by the 42.1.2.
I might not be at sebbohs talent, but he's a great inspiration.



arstein
Registered: Feb 26, 2002
Total Posts: 83
Country: United States


Canon FL 55mm 1.2



This image is copyrighted by the owner




Gunzorro
Registered: Aug 28, 2010
Total Posts: 4420
Country: United States

1D3, 50/1.2L, ISO 200



This image is copyrighted by the owner





This image is copyrighted by the owner




Taylor Sherman
Registered: Mar 26, 2012
Total Posts: 454
Country: United States

CV 35/1.2 II on the Nex-7

This image is copyrighted by the owner
DSC05924.jpg by Taylor Sherman, on Flickr



Taylor Sherman
Registered: Mar 26, 2012
Total Posts: 454
Country: United States

same:

This image is copyrighted by the owner
DSC05913.jpg by Taylor Sherman, on Flickr



1       2       3              28      
29
       30              36       37       end