Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
/forum/topic/1097477/54

1       2       3              54      
55
       56              578       579       end

ceder
Registered: May 13, 2011
Total Posts: 299
Country: Sweden

And by the way, what was this business with "boo-yeah"?



Nathan67
Registered: Feb 26, 2005
Total Posts: 1557
Country: Norway

olelovold wrote:




I can feel the cold in this shot...
The Atlantic Road, Aver°y if I am not mistaken?



Nathan67
Registered: Feb 26, 2005
Total Posts: 1557
Country: Norway

Surnadal sunset, xpro1 and 35mm iso 500 f8 handheld...



Nathan67
Registered: Feb 26, 2005
Total Posts: 1557
Country: Norway

Xpro1 35mm at f1.4





veeresh.ai
Registered: Oct 09, 2010
Total Posts: 65
Country: United States

Adobe just release ACR 7.4 with better de-mosaic algorithm for X-Trans sensors:

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/cameraraw7-4/?tabID=details#tabTop

Can someone give it a shot on CS6 and let us know how it works?



MagicNikon
Registered: Jul 09, 2006
Total Posts: 2073
Country: United States



















X-E1 and 60mm 2.4


Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 13008
Country: United States

Not the greatest shot, but I had to test stuff out. My EOS and FD adapters arrived today, so now I've got a lot more lenses I can use on the X-E1. The Rokinon 85/1.4 was never very good on m4/3...the long-ish telephoto was sort of in no-mans land and the pixel density was just a little too much for the Rokinon to handle at wider apertures. Works very well on the X-E1, though, giving me a longer portrait prime (I've always preferred the FOV from a 135mm lens on FF to something like an 85)...this combo makes for a very nice shallow DOF combo for times I want it.

X-E1 + Rokinon 85/1.4 wide open:






Brody LeBlanc
Registered: Oct 04, 2007
Total Posts: 1052
Country: Canada

veeresh.ai wrote:
Adobe just release ACR 7.4 with better de-mosaic algorithm for X-Trans sensors:

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/cameraraw7-4/?tabID=details#tabTop

Can someone give it a shot on CS6 and let us know how it works?


Does this mean LR should be getting an update soon? That'd be awesome.



DIS Ottawa
Registered: Jul 14, 2006
Total Posts: 1416
Country: Canada

The Release Candidate is for both ACR and Lightroom. It expires on May 31st, so that usually means the actual update is released the same day.



Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 13008
Country: United States

Lightroom RC: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom4-4/

Installing now. DPReview has a comparison between ACR 7.3 and 7.4RC, as well as C1. I never liked the odd artifacts that C1 would generate due to overly aggressive sharpening and NR, and have generally preferred Lightroom for a more natural look. From DPReview's comparisons, it seems that the latest release candidate makes huge improvements with X-Trans, rendering an accurate, artifact-free file that looks very natural. Kudos to Adobe!



Dave McGaughey
Registered: Jul 08, 2003
Total Posts: 796
Country: United States

ACR 7.4 is definitely much better than ACR 7.3. Whether it's better than C1 or Silkypix is less clear and likely will come down to personal preference. It's great that Adobe has finally caught up......



Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 13008
Country: United States

For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....



JustinZ850
Registered: Aug 08, 2012
Total Posts: 129
Country: United States

Jman13 wrote:
For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....


Now this is good to hear!!!



veeresh.ai
Registered: Oct 09, 2010
Total Posts: 65
Country: United States

Jman13 wrote:
For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....



Thank you so much for the update Jordan, I am downloading LR now .



Ssnycshoot
Registered: Nov 27, 2010
Total Posts: 245
Country: United States

Just got the camera last week. Love it so far. All shot with X-E1 with ZM 50mm planar with minimum or no PP.

1.


2.


3.


4.







Brody LeBlanc
Registered: Oct 04, 2007
Total Posts: 1052
Country: Canada

Well, I'll be....


They Did It - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 Summicron & Speedbooster [LR4.4] by brodyl.91, on Flickr

Adobe got their shit together, it looks just as good as C1 I'd say.



naturephoto1
Registered: Nov 09, 2005
Total Posts: 3759
Country: United States

I am re-posting the sunset photo that I posted several days ago (my first photo with my X-E1 with my Leica R 35-70 f4 Vario Elmar zoom lens). These were done quickly. The first was done through LR 4.3 and the second by LR 4.4.

Rich



Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 13008
Country: United States

You still need to pull down exposure a fair bit. You've blown the red channel pretty severely here...it may not be recoverable.



Jman13
Registered: May 02, 2005
Total Posts: 13008
Country: United States

X-E1 with Canon FD 50-300mm f/4.5L and Canon 2x TC @ 600mm, f/16. Branches in the moonlight:







And a self portrait with the 35/1.4:






naturephoto1
Registered: Nov 09, 2005
Total Posts: 3759
Country: United States

Jman13 wrote:
You still need to pull down exposure a fair bit. You've blown the red channel pretty severely here...it may not be recoverable.


The image is underexposed and I didn't have time to use a reverse ND. I will post the original file as a JPEG. I don't have enough knowledge or experience at this point.

If you want to give it a shot, I would be interested in what you can do with this.

Rich



1       2       3              54      
55
       56              578       579       end