|
AhamB Registered: Jul 11, 2008 Total Posts: 4450 Country: Germany |
^^^Regarding that blog: I don't think I've ever seen so many shots, all with the same kinds of pastel colors on one page. I find the color schemes he picks very pleasing to look at. |
|
KatieInTexas Registered: Jan 27, 2011 Total Posts: 548 Country: United States |
In addition to it being a fantastic system (so I hear), I believe that lots of digital converts who have never shot film before hear about it's ease of use (autofocus, interchangeable lenses, etc...) and think this system is the nicest and easiest to transition to from a digital background. The likes of Jose Villa, Jonathon Canlas and Ryan Muirhead make this system very attractive to those who are tempted to try out film for the first time. Remember, most people in their 20's and younger grew up shooting nothing but digital! |
|
ricardovaste Registered: Jan 25, 2010 Total Posts: 2259 Country: United Kingdom |
KatieInTexas wrote:Remember, most people in their 20's and younger grew up shooting nothing but digital |
|
cyberstudio Registered: Nov 08, 2005 Total Posts: 564 Country: Canada |
I speculate there is a photo-industry-wide inflation going on in the wake of the earthquake disasters. All desirable gear appreciates and Contax 645 is just one of the examples. |
|
jcolwell Registered: Feb 10, 2005 Total Posts: 14861 Country: Canada |
cyberstudio wrote: |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 8026 Country: United States |
ricardovaste wrote: |
|
C.Rosenthal Registered: Aug 31, 2009 Total Posts: 405 Country: United States |
I am 23 years old. I shoot film and film only. It suits my shooting style and distaste for digital PP. I have zero interest in the Contax 645 system, mainly because of the price and size of the negatives. At the moment, I shoot purely 35mm with Nikon. Once I graduate, an X-pan and Mamiya 7 will be added. |
|
Tariq Gibran Registered: Oct 01, 2006 Total Posts: 8026 Country: United States |
C.Rosenthal wrote: |
|
C.Rosenthal Registered: Aug 31, 2009 Total Posts: 405 Country: United States |
Tariq Gibran wrote: |
|
KatieInTexas Registered: Jan 27, 2011 Total Posts: 548 Country: United States |
C.Rosenthal wrote: |
|
C.Rosenthal Registered: Aug 31, 2009 Total Posts: 405 Country: United States |
Thank you. It is an undergrad degree in mechanical engineering. Once I secure a job, I'll be doing everything from developing to printing and scanning in my own home. I cannot wait to start shooting 6x7 medium format. |
|
thrice Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 3352 Country: Australia |
I'm looking for a Mamiya M645 + 80/1.9 as I prefer manual focus. |
|
sebboh Registered: Nov 02, 2009 Total Posts: 7032 Country: United States |
thrice wrote: |
|
Micky Bill Registered: Nov 25, 2006 Total Posts: 2323 Country: N/A |
Im an old school film / digital user and have always felt the 645 format was a compromise. Its a wee bit bigger than 35 without the easy handling and wide lens choice and a wee bit smaller than 6x6-7-9-12 but without the film real estate and its not "that" much smaller than a 503 Hassy. |
|
sirimiri Registered: Dec 10, 2007 Total Posts: 2904 Country: United States |
645, though a compromise in some respects, does offer enough "real estate" and focus/subject isolation ability to put it in a solidly different category than 35mm, in my opinion. 6x6 is "nice" but the old argument about square and the printing world made some sense too, for using 6x7x8x9 as well. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2173 Country: United States |
C.Rosenthal wrote: |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2173 Country: United States |
thrice wrote: |
|
ManWearPants Registered: Oct 13, 2009 Total Posts: 755 Country: Qatar |
Maybe there are slightly more NAM1 adapters out there to add on to the flexibility of what you can use with these 645 bodies and lenses. |
|
mikethevilla Registered: May 22, 2008 Total Posts: 2357 Country: United States |
Weezy - just picked up an M645 with the 80 1.9 and.... I. Am. In. Love. |