Sounds like BS. Neither one looks remotely organic to me (if they mean analog, e.g., film, by organic). Both look better than any film I\'ve shot in the Portra series, Sensia or Provia series. Now film tends in show more grain at higher ISO and even in skies at ISO 100. Both the 5D and 5DII are really smooth in comparison, so maybe that\'s the \"digital\" look they\'re referring to. And, yes, the 5DII is a little smoother than the 5D at ISO 1600 and higher. To be smooth looks more natural than grainy.
Jun 13, 2010 at 03:39 PM
Previous versions of Gochugogi's message #8565362 « 5D2 looks "digital" compare to 5D? »
