my 21/2.8 is basically the same as others i have seen here and my 25/2.8 is noticeably better across the field stopped down. i don\'t shoot it wider than f8 and i don\'t shoot it close either. i don\'t care about distortion.
Herb...
denoir wrote:
The 16-35 is referred to as the \"highly regarded\" in this review, while in the 21/2.8 review it is dismissed as basically lousy. I first switched to Zeiss because of the inadequacies of the 16-35. So, no big loss really, not having a ZE version of this particular lens
Jun 09, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Previous versions of HerbChong's message #8552683 « Zeiss 25mm ZF.2 announced »
